Intel CPU Microarchitecture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Tick_Tock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_(microarchitecture)
Intel Core (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromCore (microarchitecture))
This article is about the Intel microarchitecture. For Intel processors branded asIntel Core, seeIntel Core.
| L1cache | 64 kB per core |
|---|---|
| L2 cache | 1 MB to 8 MB unified |
| L3 cache | 8 MB to 16 MB shared (Xeon) |
| Predecessor | Enhanced Pentium M |
| Successor | Penryn (tick) Nehalem (tock) |
| Socket(s) |
Socket M(μPGA 478) |
TheIntel Core microarchitecture(previously known as theNext-Generation Micro-Architecture) is a multi-coreprocessormicroarchitectureunveiled byIntelin Q1 2006. It is based on theYonahprocessor design and can be considered an iteration of theP6 microarchitecture, introduced in 1995 withPentium Pro. The high power consumption and heat intensity, the resulting inability to effectively increaseclock speed, and other shortcomings such as the inefficient pipeline were the primary reasons for which Intel abandoned theNetBurst microarchitectureand switched to completely different architectural design, delivering high efficiency through a small pipeline rather than high clock speeds. It is worth noting that the Core microarchitecture never reached the clock speeds of the Netburst microarchitecture, even after moving to the 45nmlithography.
The first processors that used this architecture were code-namedMerom,Conroe, andWoodcrest; Merom is for mobile computing, Conroe is for desktop systems, and Woodcrest is for servers and workstations. While architecturally identical, the three processor lines differ in the socket used, bus speed, and power consumption. Mainstream Core-based processors are brandedPentium Dual-CoreorPentiumand low end brandedCeleron; server and workstation Core-based processors are brandedXeon, while desktop and mobile Core-based processors are branded asCore 2. Despite their names, processors sold asCore Solo/Core DuoandCorei3/i5/i7 do not actually use the Core microarchitecture and are based on theEnhanced Pentium Mand newerNehalem/Sandy Bridge/Haswellmicroarchitectures, respectively.
Contents
[hide]
1Features
2Roadmap
3Technology
4Processor cores
4.1Conroe/Merom (65 nm)
4.2Conroe-L/Merom-L
4.3Penryn/Wolfdale (45 nm)
4.4Dunnington
5Steppings
5.1Steppings using 65nm process
5.2Steppings using 45nm process
6System requirements
6.1Motherboard compatibility
6.2Synchronous memory modules
7Chip errata
8Key Terms
9See also
10References
11External links
Features[edit]
The Core microarchitecture returned to lowerclock ratesand improved the usage of both available clock cycles and power when compared with the precedingNetBurst microarchitectureof thePentium 4/D-branded CPUs.[1]The Core microarchitecture provides more efficient decoding stages, execution units,caches, andbuses, reducing thepower consumptionof Core 2-branded CPUs while increasing their processing capacity. Intel's CPUs have varied widely in power consumption according to clock rate, architecture, and semiconductor process, shown in theCPU power dissipationtables.
Like the last NetBurst CPUs, Core based processors feature multiple cores and hardware virtualization support (marketed asIntel VT-x), as well asIntel 64andSSSE3. However, Core-based processors do not have theHyper-Threading Technologyfound in Pentium 4 processors. This is because the Core microarchitecture is a descendant of theP6 microarchitectureused by Pentium Pro, Pentium II, Pentium III, and Pentium M.
The L1 cache size was enlarged in the Core microarchitecture, from 32KB on Pentium II/III (16 KB L1 Data + 16 KB L1 Instruction) to 64 KB L1 cache/core (32 KB L1 Data + 32 KB L1 Instruction) on Pentium M and Core/Core 2. It also lacks an L3 Cache found in the Gallatin core of the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition, although an L3 Cache is present in high-end versions of Core-based Xeons. Both an L3 cache and Hyper-threading were reintroduced in theNehalem microarchitecture.
Roadmap[edit]
Main article:Intel Tick-Tock
|
|||
Technology[edit]
While the Core microarchitecture is a major architectural revision it is based in part on thePentium Mprocessor family designed by Intel Israel.[2]ThePenrynpipelineis 12–14 stages long[3]— less than half ofPrescott's, a signature feature of wide order execution cores. Penryn's successor,Nehalemhas 16 pipeline stages.[3]Core'sexecution unitis 4 issues wide, compared to the 3-issue cores ofP6,Pentium M, and 2-issue cores ofNetBurstmicroarchitectures. The new architecture is a dual core design with linkedL1 cacheand sharedL2 cacheengineered for maximumperformance per wattand improved scalability.
One new technology included in the design isMacro-Ops Fusion, which combines twox86instructions into a singlemicro-operation. For example, a common code sequence like a compare followed by a conditional jump would become a single micro-op.
Other new technologies include 1 cycle throughput (2 cycles previously) of all 128-bit SSE instructions and a new power saving design. All components will run at minimum speed, ramping up speed dynamically as needed (similar to AMD'sCool'n'Quietpower-saving technology, as well as Intel's ownSpeedSteptechnology from earlier mobile processors). This allows the chip to produce less heat, and consume as little power as possible.
Intel Core microarchitecture.
For most Woodcrest CPUs, thefront side bus (FSB)runs at 1333MT/s; however, this is scaled down to 1066MT/s for lower end 1.60 and 1.86GHz variants.[4][5]The Merom mobile variant was initially targeted to run at a FSB of 667MT/s while the second wave of Meroms, supporting 800MT/s FSB, were released as part of the Santa Rosa platform with a different socket in May 2007. The desktop-oriented Conroe began with models having an FSB of 800MT/s or 1066MT/s with a 1333MT/s line officially launched on July 22, 2007.
The power consumption of these new processors is extremely low—average use energy consumption is to be in the 1–2 watt range in ultra low voltage variants, withthermal design powers(TDPs) of 65 watts for Conroe and most Woodcrests, 80 watts for the 3.0GHz Woodcrest, and 40 watts for the low-voltage Woodcrest. In comparison, an AMDOpteron875HE processor consumes 55 watts, while the energy efficientSocket AM2line fits in the 35 wattthermal envelope(specified a different way so not directly comparable). Merom, the mobile variant, is listed at 35 watts TDP for standard versions and 5 watts TDP for Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) versions.[citation needed]
Previously, Intel announced that it would now focus on power efficiency, rather than raw performance. However, atIDFin the spring of 2006, Intel advertised both. Some of the promised numbers were:
20% more performance for Merom at the same power level (compared toCore Duo)
40% more performance for Conroe at 40% less power (compared toPentium D)
80% more performance for Woodcrest at 35% less power (compared to the originaldual-core Xeon)
Processor cores[edit]
The processors of the Core microarchitecture can be categorized by number of cores, cache size, and socket; each combination of these has a unique code name and product code that is used across a number of brands. For instance, code name "Allendale" with product code 80557 has two cores, 2 MB L2 cache and uses the desktop socket 775, but has been marketed as Celeron, Pentium, Core 2 and Xeon, each with different sets of features enabled. Most of the mobile and desktop processors come in two variants that differ in the size of the L2 cache, but the specific amount of L2 cache in a product can also be reduced by disabling parts at production time. Wolfdale-DP and all quad-core processors except Dunnington QC are multi-chip modules combining two dies. For the 65nm processors, the same product code can be shared by processors with different dies, but the specific information about which one is used can be derived from the stepping.
| fab | cores | Mobile | Desktop, UP Server | CL Server | DP Server | MP Server | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-Core65 nm | 65 nm | 1 | Merom-L 80537 |
Conroe-L 80557 |
|||||
| Single-Core45 nm | 45 nm | 1 | Penryn-L 80585 |
Wolfdale-CL 80588 |
|||||
| Dual-Core 65nm | 65nm | 2 | Merom-2M 80537 |
Merom 80537 |
Allendale 80557 |
Conroe 80557 |
Conroe-CL 80556 |
Woodcrest 80556 |
Tigerton-DC 80564 |
| Dual-Core 45nm | 45nm | 2 | Penryn-3M 80577 |
Penryn 80576 |
Wolfdale-3M 80571 |
Wolfdale 80570 |
Wolfdale-CL 80588 |
Wolfdale-DP 80573 |
|
| Quad-Core 65nm | 65nm | 4 | Kentsfield 80562 |
Clovertown 80563 |
Tigerton 80565 |
||||
| Quad-Core 45nm | 45nm | 4 | Penryn-QC 80581 |
Yorkfield-6M 80580 |
Yorkfield 80569 |
Yorkfield-CL 80584 |
Harpertown 80574 |
Dunnington QC 80583 |
|
| Six-Core 45nm | 45nm | 6 | Dunnington 80582 |
||||||
Conroe/Merom (65 nm)[edit]
Main article:Conroe (microprocessor)
The original Core 2 processors are based around the same dies that can be identified asCPUIDFamily 6 Model 15. Depending on their configuration and packaging, their code names are Conroe (LGA 775, 4 MB L2 cache), Allendale (LGA 775, 2 MB L2 cache), Merom (Socket M, 4 MB L2 cache) and Kentsfield (Multi-chip module, LGA 775, 2x4MB L2 cache). Merom and Allendale processors with limited features can be found inPentium Dual CoreandCeleronprocessors, while Conroe, Allendale and Kentsfield also are sold asXeonprocessors.
Additional code names for processors based on this model areWoodcrest(LGA 771, 4 MB L2 cache),Clovertown(MCM, LGA 771, 2×4MB L2 cache) andTigerton(MCM,Socket 604, 2×4MB L2 cache), all of which are marketed only under the Xeon brand.
| Processor | Brand name | Model (list) | Cores | L2 Cache | Socket | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merom-2M | Mobile Core 2 Duo | U7xxx | 2 | 2 MiB | BGA479 | 10 W |
| Merom | L7xxx | 4 MiB | 17 W | |||
| Merom Merom-2M |
T5xxx T7xxx |
2–4 MiB | Socket M Socket P BGA479 |
35 W | ||
| Merom | Mobile Core 2 Extreme | X7xxx | 2 | 4 MiB | Socket P | 44 W |
| Merom | Celeron M | 5x0 | 1 | 512 KiB | Socket M Socket P |
30 W |
| Merom-2M | 5x5 | Socket P | 31 W | |||
| Merom-2M | Celeron Dual-Core | T1xxx | 2 | 512–1024 KiB | Socket P | 35 W |
| Merom-2M | Pentium Dual-Core | T2xxx T3xxx |
2 | 1 MiB | Socket P | 35 W |
| Allendale | Xeon | 3xxx | 2 | 2 MB | LGA 775 | 65 W |
| Conroe | 3xxx | 2–4 MB | ||||
| Conroe and Allendale |
Core 2 Duo | E4xxx | 2 | 2 MB | LGA 775 | 65 W |
| E6xx0 | 2–4 MB | |||||
| Conroe-CL | E6xx5 | 2–4 MB | LGA 771 | |||
| Conroe-XE | Core 2 Extreme | X6xxx | 2 | 4 MB | LGA 775 | 75 W |
| Allendale | Pentium Dual-Core | E2xxx | 2 | 1 MB | LGA 775 | 65 W |
| Allendale | Celeron | E1xxx | 2 | 512 kB | LGA 775 | 65 W |
| Kentsfield | Xeon | 32xx | 4 | 2×4 MiB | LGA 775 | 95–105 W |
| Kentsfield | Core 2 Quad | Q6xxx | 4 | 2×4 MiB | LGA 775 | 95–105 W |
| Kentsfield XE | Core 2 Extreme | QX6xxx | 4 | 2×4 MiB | LGA 775 | 130 W |
| Woodcrest | Xeon | 51xx | 2 | 4 MB | LGA 771 | 65–80 W |
| Clovertown | L53xx | 4 | 2×4 MB | LGA 771 | 40–50 W | |
| E53xx | 80 W | |||||
| X53xx | 120–150 W | |||||
| Tigerton-DC | E72xx | 2 | 2×4 MB | Socket 604 | 80 W | |
| Tigerton | L73xx | 4 | 50 W | |||
| E73xx | 2×2–2×4 MB | 80 W | ||||
| X73xx | 2×4 MB | 130 W |
Conroe-L/Merom-L[edit]
The Conroe-L and Merom-L processors are based around the same core as Conroe and Merom, but only contain a single core and 1 MB of L2 cache, significantly reducing production cost and power consumption of the processor at the expense of performance compared to the dual-core version. It is used only in ultra-low voltage Core 2 Solo U2xxx and in Celeron processors and is identified as CPUID family 6 model 22.
| Processor | Brand name | Model (list) | Cores | L2 Cache | Socket | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merom-L | MobileCore 2 Solo | U2xxx | 1 | 2 MiB | BGA479 | 5.5 W |
| Merom-L | Celeron M | 5x0 | 1 | 512 KiB | Socket M Socket P |
27 W |
| Merom-L | 5x3 | 512–1024 KiB | BGA479 | 5.5–10 W | ||
| Conroe-L | Celeron M | 4x0 | 1 | 512 KiB | LGA 775 | 35 W |
| Conroe-CL | 4x5 | LGA 771 | 65 W |
Penryn/Wolfdale (45 nm)[edit]
Main article:Penryn (microarchitecture)
In Intel'sTick-Tockcycle, the 2007/2008 "Tick" was the shrink of the Core microarchitecture to 45 nanometers as CPUID model 23. In Core 2 processors, it is used with the code names Penryn (Socket P), Wolfdale (LGA 775) and Yorkfield (MCM, LGA 775), some of which are also sold as Celeron, Pentium and Xeon processors. In the Xeon brand, theWolfdale-DPandHarpertowncode names are used for LGA 771 based MCMs with two or four active Wolfdale cores.
The chips come in two sizes, with 6 MB and 3 MB L2 cache. The smaller version is commonly called Penryn-3M and Wolfdale-3M as well as Yorkfield-6M, respectively. The single-core version of Penryn, listed as Penryn-L here, is not a separate model like Merom-L but a version of the Penryn-3M model with only one active core.
| Processor | Brand name | Model (list) | Cores | L2 Cache | Socket | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penryn-L | Core 2 Solo | SU3xxx | 1 | 3 MiB | BGA956 | 5.5 W |
| Penryn-3M | Core 2 Duo | SU7xxx | 2 | 3 MB | BGA956 | 10W |
| SU9xxx | ||||||
| Penryn | SL9xxx | 6 MiB | 17 W | |||
| SP9xxx | 25/28 W | |||||
| Penryn-3M | P7xxx | 3 MiB | Socket P FCBGA6 |
25 W | ||
| P8xxx | ||||||
| Penryn | P9xxx | 6 MiB | ||||
| Penryn-3M | T6xxx | 2 MiB | 35 W | |||
| T8xxx | 3 MiB | |||||
| Penryn | T9xxx | 6 MiB | ||||
| E8x35 | 6 MiB | Socket P | 35-55 W | |||
| Penryn-QC | Core 2 Quad | Q9xxx | 4 | 2x3-2x6 MiB | Socket P | 45 W |
| Penryn XE | Core 2 Extreme | X9xxx | 2 | 6 MiB | Socket P | 44 W |
| Penryn-QC | QX9xxx | 4 | 2x6 MiB | 45 W | ||
| Penryn-3M | Celeron | T3xxx | 2 | 1 MiB | Socket P | 35 W |
| SU2xxx | μFC-BGA 956 | 10 W | ||||
| Penryn-L | 9x0 | 1 | 1 MiB | Socket P | 35 W | |
| 7x3 | μFC-BGA 956 | 10 W | ||||
| Penryn-3M | Pentium | T4xxx | 2 | 1 MiB | Socket P | 35 W |
| SU4xxx | 2 MiB | μFC-BGA 956 | 10 W | |||
| Penryn-L | SU2xxx | 1 | 5.5 W | |||
| Wolfdale-3M | ||||||
| Celeron | E3xxx | 2 | 1 MB | LGA 775 | 65 W | |
| Pentium | E2210 | |||||
| E5xxx | 2 MB | |||||
| E6xxx | ||||||
| Core 2 Duo | E7xxx | 3 MB | ||||
| Wolfdale | E8xxx | 6 MB | ||||
| Xeon | 31x0 | 45-65 W | ||||
| Wolfdale-CL | 30x4 | 1 | LGA 771 | 30 W | ||
| 31x3 | 2 | 65 W | ||||
| Yorkfield | Xeon | X33x0 | 4 | 2×3–2×6 MB | LGA 775 | 65–95 W |
| Yorkfield-CL | X33x3 | LGA 771 | 80 W | |||
| Yorkfield-6M | Core 2 Quad | Q8xxx | 2×2 MB | LGA 775 | 65–95 W | |
| Q9x0x | 2×3 MB | |||||
| Yorkfield | Q9x5x | 2×6 MB | ||||
| Yorkfield XE | Core 2 Extreme | QX9xxx | 2×6 MB | 130–136 W | ||
| QX9xx5 | LGA 771 | 150 W | ||||
| Wolfdale-DP | Xeon | E52xx | 2 | 6 MB | LGA 771 | 65 W |
| L52xx | 20-55 W | |||||
| X52xx | 80 W | |||||
| Harpertown | E54xx | 4 | 2×6 MB | LGA 771 | 80 W | |
| L54xx | 40-50 W | |||||
| X54xx | 120-150 W |
Dunnington[edit]
TheXeon "Dunnington"processor (CPUID Family 6, model 30) is closely related to Wolfdale but comes with six cores and an on-chip L3 cache and is designed for servers with Socket 604, so it is marketed only as Xeon, not as Core 2.
| Processor | Brand name | Model (list) | Cores | L3 Cache | Socket | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunnington | Xeon | E74xx | 4-6 | 8-16 MB | Socket 604 | 90 W |
| L74xx | 4-6 | 12 MB | 50-65 W | |||
| X7460 | 6 | 16 MB | 130 W |
Steppings[edit]
The Core microarchitecture uses a number ofsteppings, which unlike previous microarchitectures not only represent incremental improvements but also different sets of features like cache size and low power modes. Most of these steppings are used across brands, typically by disabling some of the features and limiting clock frequencies on low-end chips.
Steppings with a reduced cache size use a separate naming scheme, which means that the releases are no longer in alphabetic order. Additional steppings have been used in internal and engineering samples, but are not listed in the tables.
Many of the high-end Core 2 and Xeon processors useMulti-Chip Modulesof two or three chips in order to get larger cache sizes or more than two cores.
Steppings using 65nm process[edit]
| Mobile (Merom) | Desktop (Conroe) | Desktop (Kentsfield) | Server (Woodcrest,Clovertown,Tigerton) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stepping | Released | Area | CPUID | L2 cache | Max. clock | Celeron | Pentium | Core 2 | Celeron | Pentium | Core 2 | Xeon | Core 2 | Xeon | Xeon |
| B2 | Jul 2006 | 143mm2 | 06F6 | 4MiB | 2.93GHz | M5xx | T5000T7000L7000 | E6000X6000 | 3000 | 5100 | |||||
| B3 | Nov 2006 | 143mm2 | 06F7 | 4MiB | 3.00GHz | Q6000QX6000 | 3200 | 5300 | |||||||
| L2 | Jan 2007 | 111mm2 | 06F2 | 2MiB | 2.13GHz | T5000U7000 | E2000 | E4000E6000 | 3000 | ||||||
| E1 | May 2007 | 143mm2 | 06FA | 4MiB | 2.80GHz | M5xx | T7000L7000X7000 | ||||||||
| G0 | Apr 2007 | 143mm2 | 06FB | 4MiB | 3.00GHz | M5xx | T7000L7000X7000 | E2000 | E4000E6000 | 3000 | Q6000QX6000 | 3200 | 5100530072007300 | ||
| G2 | Mar 2009 | 143mm2 | 06FB | 4MiB | 2.16GHz | M5xx | T5000T7000L7000 | ||||||||
| M0 | Jul 2007 | 111mm2 | 06FD | 2MiB | 2.40GHz | 5xxT1000 | T2000T3000 | T5000T7000U7000 | E1000 | E2000 | E4000 | ||||
| A1 | Jun 2007 | 81mm2 | 10661 | 1MiB | 2.20GHz | M5xx | U2000 | 2204x0 | |||||||
Steppings B2/B3, E1 and G0 of model 15 (cpuid 06fx) processors are evolutionary steps of the standard Merom/Conroe die with 4MiB L2 cache, with the short-lived E1 stepping only being used in mobile processors. Stepping L2 and M0 are the "Allendale" chips with just 2MiB L2 cache, reducing production cost and power consumption for low-end processors.
The G0 and M0 steppings improve idle power consumption in C1E state and add the C2E state in desktop processors. In mobile processors, all of which support C1 through C4 idle states, steppings E1, G0, and M0 add support for the Mobile Intel 965 Express (Santa Rosa) platform withSocket P, while the earlier B2 and L2 steppings only appear for theSocket Mbased Mobile Intel 945 Express (Napa refresh) platform.
The model 22 stepping A1 (cpuid 10661h) marks a significant design change, with just a single core and 1MiB L2 cache further reducing the power consumption and manufacturing cost for the low-end. Like the earlier steppings, A1 is not used with the Mobile Intel 965 Express platform.
Steppings G0, M0 and A1 mostly replaced all older steppings in 2008. In 2009, a new stepping G2 was introduced to replace the original stepping B2.[6]
Steppings using 45nm process[edit]
| Mobile (Penryn) | Desktop (Wolfdale) | Desktop (Yorkfield) | Server (Wolfdale-DP,Harpertown,Dunnington) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stepping | Released | Area | CPUID | L2 cache | Max. clock | Celeron | Pentium | Core2 | Celeron | Pentium | Core2 | Xeon | Core2 | Xeon | Xeon |
| C0 | Nov 2007 | 107mm2 | 10676 | 6MiB | 3.00GHz | E8000P7000T8000T9000P9000SP9000SL9000X9000 | E8000 | 3100 | QX9000 | 52005400 | |||||
| M0 | Mar 2008 | 82mm2 | 10676 | 3MiB | 2.40GHz | 7xx | SU3000P7000P8000T8000SU9000 | E5000E2000 | E7000 | ||||||
| C1 | Mar 2008 | 107mm2 | 10677 | 6MiB | 3.20GHz | Q9000QX9000 | 3300 | ||||||||
| M1 | Mar 2008 | 82mm2 | 10677 | 3MiB | 2.50GHz | Q8000Q9000 | 3300 | ||||||||
| E0 | Aug 2008 | 107mm2 | 1067A | 6MiB | 3.33GHz | T9000P9000SP9000SL9000Q9000QX9000 | E8000 | 3100 | Q9000Q9000SQX9000 | 3300 | 52005400 | ||||
| R0 | Aug 2008 | 82mm2 | 1067A | 3MiB | 2.93GHz | 7xx900SU2000T3000 | T4000SU2000SU4000 | SU3000T6000SU7000P8000SU9000 | E3000 | E5000E6000 | E7000 | Q8000Q8000SQ9000Q9000S | 3300 | ||
| A1 | Sep 2008 | 503mm2 | 106D1 | 3MiB | 2.67GHz | 7400 | |||||||||
In the model 23 (cpuid 01067xh), Intel started marketing stepping with full (6MiB) and reduced (3MiB) L2 cache at the same time, and giving them identical cpuid values. All steppings have the newSSE4.1instructions. Stepping C1/M1 was a bug fix version of C0/M0 specifically for quad core processors and only used in those. Stepping E0/R0 adds two new instructions (XSAVE/XRSTOR) and replaces all earlier steppings.
In mobile processors, stepping C0/M0 is only used in the Intel Mobile 965 Express (Santa Rosa refresh) platform, whereas stepping E0/R0 supports the later Intel Mobile 4 Express (Montevina) platform.
Model 30 stepping A1 (cpuid 106d1h) adds an L3 cache as well as six instead of the usual two cores, which leads to an unusually large die size of 503mm2.[7]As of February 2008, it has only found its way into the very high-end Xeon 7400 series (Dunnington).
System requirements[edit]
Motherboard compatibility[edit]
Conroe, Conroe XE and Allendale all use SocketLGA 775; however, not everymotherboardis compatible with these processors.
Supportingchipsetsare:
Intel: 865G/PE/P, 945G/GZ/GC/P/PL, 965G/P, 975X, P/G/Q965, Q963, 946GZ/PL, P3x, G3x, Q3x, X38, X48, P4x, 5400 Express, Intel G31, G33 Chipsets
NVIDIA:nForce4 Ultra/SLI X16for Intel,nForce 570/590 SLIfor Intel,nForce 650i Ultra/650i SLI/680i LT SLI/680i SLIandnForce 750i SLI/780i SLI/790i SLI/790i Ultra SLI.
VIA: P4M800, P4M800PRO, P4M890, P4M900, PT880 Pro/Ultra, PT890.
SiS: 662, 671, 671fx, 672, 672fx
ATI:Radeon Xpress 200and CrossFire Xpress 3200 for Intel
See also:List of Intel chipsets
The currently released Yorkfield XE model QX9770 (45nm with 1600FSB) currently has limited chipset compatibility - with only X38, P35 (WithOverclocking) and some high-performance X48 and P45 motherboards being compatible. BIOS updates are gradually being released to provide support for the new Penryn technology, and the new QX9775 is only compatible with D5400XS. The Wolfdale-3M model E7200 also has limited compatibility (at least the Xpress 200 chipset is incompatible)[citation needed].
Although a motherboard may have the required chipset to support Conroe, some motherboards based on the above mentioned chipsets do not support Conroe. This is because all Conroe-based processors require a new power delivery feature set specified inVoltage Regulator-Down (VRD) 11.0. This requirement is a result of Conroe's significantly lower power consumption, compared to the Pentium 4/D CPUs it is replacing. A motherboard that has both a supporting chipset and VRD 11 supports Conroe processors, but even then some boards will need an updatedBIOSto recognize Conroe's FID (Frequency ID) and VID (Voltage ID).
Synchronous memory modules[edit]
Unlike the previousPentium 4andPentium Ddesign, the Core 2 technology sees a greater benefit from memory runningsynchronouslywith theFront Side Bus(FSB). This means that for the Conroe CPUs with FSB of 1066MT/s, the ideal memory performance for DDR2 isPC2-8500. In a few configurations, usingPC2-5300instead of PC2-4200 can actually decrease performance. Only when going toPC2-6400is there a significant performance increase. While DDR2 memory models with tighter timing specifications do improve performance, the difference in real world games and applications is often negligible.[8]
Optimally, the memory bandwidth afforded should match the bandwidth of the FSB, that is to say that a CPU with a 533MT/s rated bus speed should be paired with RAM matching the same rated speed, for example DDR2 533, or PC2-4200. A common myth[citation needed]is that installing interleaved RAM will offer double the bandwidth. However, at most the increase in bandwidth by installing interleaved RAM is roughly 5–10%. TheAGTL+ PSB[dead link]used by allNetBurstprocessors as well as current and medium-term (pre-QuickPath) Core 2 processors provide a 64-bit data path. Current chipsets provide for a couple of either DDR2 or DDR3 channels.
| Processor model | Front side bus | Matched memory and maximum bandwidth single channel / dual channel |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDR | DDR2 | DDR3 | ||
| mobile:T5200, T5300, U2n00, U7n00 | 533MT/s | PC-3200 (DDR-400) 3.2 GB/s |
PC2-4200 (DDR2-533) 4.264 GB/s PC2-8500 (DDR2-1066) 8.532 GB/s |
PC3-8500 (DDR3-1066) 8.530 GB/s |
| desktop:E6n00, E6n20, X6n00, E7n00, Q6n00 and QX6n00 mobile:T9400, T9550, T9600, P7350, P7450, P8400, P8600, P8700, P9500, P9600, SP9300, SP9400, X9100 |
1066 MT/s | |||
| mobile:T5n00, T5n50, T7n00 (Socket M), L7200, L7400 | 667 MT/s | PC-3200 (DDR-400) 3.2 GB/s |
PC2-5300 (DDR2-667) 5.336 GB/s |
PC3-10600 (DDR3-1333) 10.670 GB/s |
| desktop:E6n40, E6n50, E8nn0, Q9nn0, QX6n50, QX9650 | 1333 MT/s | |||
| mobile:T5n70, T6400, T7n00 (Socket P), L7300, L7500, X7n00, T8n00, T9300, T9500, X9000 desktop:E4n00, Pentium E2nn0, Pentium E5nn0, Celeron 4n0, E3n00 |
800 MT/s | PC-3200 (DDR-400) 3.2 GB/s PC-3200 (DDR-400) 3.2 GB/s |
PC2-6400 (DDR2-800) 6.400 GB/s PC2-8500 (DDR2-1066) 8.532 GB/s |
PC3-6400 (DDR3-800) 6.400 GB/s PC3-12800 (DDR3-1600) 12.800 GB/s |
| desktop:QX9770, QX9775 | 1600 MT/s | |||
On jobs requiring large amounts of memory access, the quad-core Core 2 processors can benefit significantly[9]from using aPC2-8500memory, which runs exactly the same speed as the CPU's FSB; this is not an officially supported configuration, but a number of motherboards offer it.
The Core 2 processor does not require the use of DDR2. While the Intel 975X and P965 chipsets require this memory, some motherboards and chipsets support both the Core 2 andDDRmemory. When using DDR memory, performance may be reduced because of the lower available memory bandwidth.
Chip errata[edit]
The Core 2memory management unit(MMU) in X6800, E6000 and E4000 processors does not operate to previous specificationsimplementedin previous generations ofx86hardware. This may cause problems, many of them serious security and stability issues, with existingoperating systemsoftware. Intel's documentation states that their programming manuals will be updated "in the coming months" with information on recommended methods of managing thetranslation lookaside buffer(TLB) for Core 2 to avoid issues, and admits that, "in rare instances, improper TLB invalidation may result in unpredictable system behavior, such as hangs or incorrect data."[10]
Among the issues noted:
Non-executebit is shared across the cores.
Floating point instruction non-coherencies.
Allowed memory corruptions outside of the range of permitted writing for a process by running common instruction sequences.
IntelerrataAx39, Ax43, Ax65, Ax79, Ax90, Ax99 are said to be particularly serious.[11]39, 43, 79, which can cause unpredictable behavior or system hang, have been fixed in recentsteppings.
Among those who have noted the errata to be particularly serious areOpenBSD'sTheo de Raadt[12]andDragonFly BSD'sMatthew Dillon.[13]Taking a contrasting view wasLinus Torvalds, calling the TLB issue "totally insignificant", adding, "The biggest problem is that Intel should just have documented the TLB behavior better."[14]
Microsoft has issued update KB936357 to address the errata bymicrocodeupdate,[15]with no performance penalty. BIOS updates are also available to fix the issue.
Key Terms[edit]
MT/s. Millions of transfers/second, each transfer on the Intel Core architecture is 32-bits.
See also[edit]
x86 architecture
List of Intel CPU microarchitectures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penryn_(microarchitecture)
Penryn (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| L1cache | 64 KB per core |
|---|---|
| L2 cache | 3 MB to 12 MB unified |
| L3 cache | 8 MB to 16 MB shared (Xeon) |
| Predecessor | Core |
| Successor | Nehalem |
| Socket(s) |
Socket M(μPGA 478) |
In Intel'sTick-Tockcycle, the 2007/2008 "Tick" was the shrink of the Core microarchitecture to 45 nanometers as CPUID model 23. In Core 2 processors, it is used with the code namesPenryn(Socket P), Wolfdale (LGA 775) and Yorkfield (MCM, LGA 775), some of which are also sold as Celeron, Pentium and Xeon processors. In the Xeon brand, theWolfdale-DPandHarpertowncode names are used for LGA 771 based MCMs with two or four active Wolfdale cores.
The chips come in two sizes, with 6 MB and 3 MB L2 cache. The smaller version is commonly called Penryn-3M and Wolfdale-3M as well as Yorkfield-6M, respectively. The single-core version of Penryn, listed as Penryn-L here, is not a separate model like Merom-L but a version of the Penryn-3M model with only one active core.
Contents
[hide]
1CPU List
2Processor cores
2.1Steppings using 45nm process
3Roadmap
4See also
5References
CPU List[edit]
| Processor | Brand name | Model (list) | Cores | L2 Cache | Socket | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penryn-L | Core 2 Solo | SU3xxx | 1 | 3 MiB | BGA956 | 5.5 W |
| Penryn-3M | Core 2 Duo | SU7xxx | 2 | 3 MB | BGA956 | 10W |
| SU9xxx | ||||||
| Penryn | SL9xxx | 6 MiB | 17 W | |||
| SP9xxx | 25/28 W | |||||
| Penryn-3M | P7xxx | 3 MiB | Socket P FCBGA6 |
25 W | ||
| P8xxx | ||||||
| Penryn | P9xxx | 6 MiB | ||||
| Penryn-3M | T6xxx | 2 MiB | 35 W | |||
| T8xxx | 3 MiB | |||||
| Penryn | T9xxx | 6 MiB | ||||
| E8x35 | 6 MiB | Socket P | 35-55 W | |||
| Penryn-QC | Core 2 Quad | Q9xxx | 4 | 2x3-2x6 MiB | Socket P | 45 W |
| Penryn XE | Core 2 Extreme | X9xxx | 2 | 6 MiB | Socket P | 44 W |
| Penryn-QC | QX9xxx | 4 | 2x6 MiB | 45 W | ||
| Penryn-3M | Celeron | T3xxx | 2 | 1 MiB | Socket P | 35 W |
| SU2xxx | μFC-BGA 956 | 10 W | ||||
| Penryn-L | 9x0 | 1 | 1 MiB | Socket P | 35 W | |
| 7x3 | μFC-BGA 956 | 10 W | ||||
| Penryn-3M | Pentium | T4xxx | 2 | 1 MiB | Socket P | 35 W |
| SU4xxx | 2 MiB | μFC-BGA 956 | 10 W | |||
| Penryn-L | SU2xxx | 1 | 5.5 W | |||
| Wolfdale-3M | ||||||
| Celeron | E3xxx | 2 | 1 MB | LGA 775 | 65 W | |
| Pentium | E2210 | |||||
| E5xxx | 2 MB | |||||
| E6xxx | ||||||
| Core 2 Duo | E7xxx | 3 MB | ||||
| Wolfdale | E8xxx | 6 MB | ||||
| Xeon | 31x0 | 45-65 W | ||||
| Wolfdale-CL | 30x4 | 1 | LGA 771 | 30 W | ||
| 31x3 | 2 | 65 W | ||||
| Yorkfield | Xeon | X33x0 | 4 | 2×3–2×6 MB | LGA 775 | 65–95 W |
| Yorkfield-CL | X33x3 | LGA 771 | 80 W | |||
| Yorkfield-6M | Core 2 Quad | Q8xxx | 2×2 MB | LGA 775 | 65–95 W | |
| Q9x0x | 2×3 MB | |||||
| Yorkfield | Q9x5x | 2×6 MB | ||||
| Yorkfield XE | Core 2 Extreme | QX9xxx | 2×6 MB | 130–136 W | ||
| QX9xx5 | LGA 771 | 150 W | ||||
| Wolfdale-DP | Xeon | E52xx | 2 | 6 MB | LGA 771 | 65 W |
| L52xx | 20-55 W | |||||
| X52xx | 80 W | |||||
| Harpertown | E54xx | 4 | 2×6 MB | LGA 771 | 80 W | |
| L54xx | 40-50 W | |||||
| X54xx | 120-150 W |
Processor cores[edit]
The processors of the Core microarchitecture can be categorized by number of cores, cache size, and socket; each combination of these has a unique code name and product code that is used across a number of brands. For instance, code name "Allendale" with product code 80557 has two cores, 2 MB L2 cache and uses the desktop socket 775, but has been marketed as Celeron, Pentium, Core 2 and Xeon, each with different sets of features enabled. Most of the mobile and desktop processors come in two variants that differ in the size of the L2 cache, but the specific amount of L2 cache in a product can also be reduced by disabling parts at production time. Wolfdale-DP and all quad-core processors except Dunnington QC are multi-chip modules combining two dies. For the 65nm processors, the same product code can be shared by processors with different dies, but the specific information about which one is used can be derived from the stepping.
| fab | cores | Mobile | Desktop, UP Server | CL Server | DP Server | MP Server | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-Core45 nm | 45 nm | 1 | Penryn-L 80585 |
Wolfdale-CL 80588 |
|||||
| Dual-Core 45nm | 45nm | 2 | Penryn-3M 80577 |
Penryn 80576 |
Wolfdale-3M 80571 |
Wolfdale 80570 |
Wolfdale-CL 80588 |
Wolfdale-DP 80573 |
|
| Quad-Core 45nm | 45nm | 4 | Penryn-QC 80581 |
Yorkfield-6M 80580 |
Yorkfield 80569 |
Yorkfield-CL 80584 |
Harpertown 80574 |
Dunnington QC 80583 |
|
| Six-Core 45nm | 45nm | 6 | Dunnington 80582 |
||||||
Steppings using 45nm process[edit]
| Mobile (Penryn) | Desktop (Wolfdale) | Desktop (Yorkfield) | Server (Wolfdale-DP,Harpertown,Dunnington) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stepping | Released | Area | CPUID | L2 cache | Max. clock | Celeron | Pentium | Core2 | Celeron | Pentium | Core2 | Xeon | Core2 | Xeon | Xeon |
| C0 | Nov 2007 | 107mm2 | 10676 | 6MiB | 3.00GHz | E8000P7000T8000T9000P9000SP9000SL9000X9000 | E8000 | 3100 | QX9000 | 52005400 | |||||
| M0 | Mar 2008 | 82mm2 | 10676 | 3MiB | 2.40GHz | 7xx | SU3000P7000P8000T8000SU9000 | E5000E2000 | E7000 | ||||||
| C1 | Mar 2008 | 107mm2 | 10677 | 6MiB | 3.20GHz | Q9000QX9000 | 3300 | ||||||||
| M1 | Mar 2008 | 82mm2 | 10677 | 3MiB | 2.50GHz | Q8000Q9000 | 3300 | ||||||||
| E0 | Aug 2008 | 107mm2 | 1067A | 6MiB | 3.33GHz | T9000P9000SP9000SL9000Q9000QX9000 | E8000 | 3100 | Q9000Q9000SQX9000 | 3300 | 52005400 | ||||
| R0 | Aug 2008 | 82mm2 | 1067A | 3MiB | 2.93GHz | 7xx900SU2000T3000 | T4000SU2000SU4000 | SU3000T6000SU7000P8000SU9000 | E3000 | E5000E6000 | E7000 | Q8000Q8000SQ9000Q9000S | 3300 | ||
| A1 | Sep 2008 | 503mm2 | 106D1 | 3MiB | 2.67GHz | 7400 | |||||||||
In the model 23 (cpuid 01067xh), Intel started marketing stepping with full (6MiB) and reduced (3MiB) L2 cache at the same time, and giving them identical cpuid values. All steppings have the newSSE4.1instructions. Stepping C1/M1 was a bug fix version of C0/M0 specifically for quad core processors and only used in those. Stepping E0/R0 adds two new instructions (XSAVE/XRSTOR) and replaces all earlier steppings.
In mobile processors, stepping C0/M0 is only used in the Intel Mobile 965 Express (Santa Rosa refresh) platform, whereas stepping E0/R0 supports the later Intel Mobile 4 Express (Montevina) platform.
Model 30 stepping A1 (cpuid 106d1h) adds an L3 cache as well as six instead of the usual two cores, which leads to an unusually large die size of 503mm2.[1]As of February 2008, it has only found its way into the very high-end Xeon 7400 series (Dunnington).
Roadmap[edit]
The main article for thiscategoryisIntel Tick-Tock.
See also[edit]
x86 architecture
List of Intel CPU microarchitectures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_(microarchitecture)
Nehalem (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, seeNehalem (disambiguation).
| L1cache | 64 KB per core |
|---|---|
| L2 cache | 256 KB per core |
| L3 cache | 4 MB to 12 MB shared |
| Predecessor | Core (tock) Penryn (tick) |
| Successor | Westmere (tick) Sandy Bridge (tock) |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 1156 |
Nehalem/n??he?l?m/[1]is thecodenamefor anIntelprocessormicroarchitecture, successor to theCore microarchitecture.[2]Nehalem processors use the45 nmprocess. A preview system with two Nehalem processors was shown atIntel Developer Forumin 2007. The first processor released with the Nehalem architecture was the desktopCore i7,[3]which was released in November 2008.
Nehalem, a recycled Intel code name, refers to an architecture that differs radically fromNetburst, while retaining some of the latter's minor features. Nehalem-based microprocessors use higher clock speeds and are more energy-efficient thanPenrynmicroprocessors.Hyper-threadingis reintroduced, along with a reduction in L2 cache size, as well as an enlarged L3 cache that is shared by all cores. Nehalem was replaced with theSandy Bridgemicroarchitecture, released in January 2011.
Contents
[hide]
1Technology
2Performance and power improvements
3Variants Overview
3.1Server and desktop processors
3.2Mobile processors
4Roadmap
5See also
6References
7Further reading
8External links
Technology[edit]
Microarchitecture of a processor core in the quad-core implementation
Hyper-threadingreintroduced.
4–12 MBL3 cache
Second-levelbranch predictorandtranslation lookaside buffer
Native (all processor cores on a single die) quad- and octa-core processors
Intel QuickPath Interconnectin high-end models replacing the legacyfront side bus
64 KB L1 cache/core (32 KB L1 Data + 32 KB L1 Instruction) and 256 KB L2 cache/core.
Integration ofPCI ExpressandDMIinto the processor in mid-range models, replacing thenorthbridge
Integratedmemory controllersupporting two or three memory channels ofDDR3 SDRAMor fourFB-DIMM2channels
2nd generation Intel Virtualization Technology, which introducedExtended Page Tablesupport, virtual processor identifiers (VPIDs), andnon-maskable interrupt-window exiting[4]
TLB Sizes[5]
| Cache | Page Size | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Level | 4 kB | 2 MB |
| DTLB | 1st | 64 | 32 |
| ITLB | 1st | 128 | 7/logical core |
| STLB | 2nd | 512 | none |
Performance and power improvements[edit]
It has been reported that Nehalem has a focus on performance, thus the increased core size.[6]Compared to Penryn, Nehalem has:
10-25% more single-threaded performance / 20-100% moremultithreadedperformance at the same power level
30% lowerpower consumptionfor the sameperformance
Nehalem provides a 15–20% clock-for-clock increase in performance per core(average)
Overclocking is possible with Bloomfield processors and theX58chipset. Lynnfield processors use aPCHremoving the need for a northbridge chipset.[7]
Nehalem processors incorporateSSE 4.2SIMDinstructions, adding 7 new instructions to the SSE 4.1 set in the Core 2 series. The Nehalem architecture reduces atomic operation latency by 50% in an attempt to eliminate atomic overhead .[8]
Variants Overview[edit]
| Processing Cores (interface) | Process | Die Size | CPUID | Model | Stepping | Mobile | Desktop, UP Server | DP Server | MP Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eight-Core(Quad-Channel) | 45nm | 684mm2 | 206E6 | 46 | D0 | Beckton(80604) | |||
| Quad-Core(Triple-Channel) | 45nm | 263mm2 | 106A4 106A5 |
26 | C0 D0 |
Bloomfield(80601) | Gainestown(80602) | ||
| Quad-Core(Dual-Channel, PCIe) | 45nm | 296mm2 | 106E4 106E5 |
30 | B0 B1 |
Clarksfield(80607) | Lynnfield(80605) | Jasper Forest(80612) | |
| Dual-Core(Dual-Channel, PCIe, Graphics Core) | 45nm | Auburndale(canceled) | Havendale(canceled) |
Lynnfield processors feature integratedPCIe1 x16 or 2 x8.
16500 series scalable up to 2 sockets, 7500 series scalable up to 4/8 sockets.[9]
Server and desktop processors[edit]
| Codename | Market | Cores/ Threads |
Socket | Processor Branding & Model |
CPU Clock rate |
Turbo | TDP | Interfaces | L3 cache |
Release Date | Price for 1k Unit |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Memory | ||||||||||||
| Beckton1 | MP Server / DP Server |
8 (16) | LGA 1567 |
Xeon[10] | X7560 | 2.26GHz | Yes | 130W | 4×QPI6.4GT/s | DDR3-800 / 1066 (Up to 4x with SMB-Ready Motherboard) |
24MB | 2010-03-30[11] | $3692 |
| X7550 | 2.0GHz | 18 MB | $2837 | ||||||||||
| X6550 | $2461 | ||||||||||||
| L7555 | 1.86GHz | 95 W | 4× QPI 5.86 GT/s | 24 MB | $3157 | ||||||||
| 6 (12) | E7540 | 2.0GHz | 105 W | 4× QPI 6.4 GT/s | 18 MB | $1980 | |||||||
| E6540 | 12 MB | $1712 | |||||||||||
| E7530 | 1.86GHz | 4× QPI 5.86 GT/s | $1391 | ||||||||||
| L7545 | 18 MB | $2087 | |||||||||||
| 6 (6) | X7542 | 2.66GHz | 130 W | $1980 | |||||||||
| 4 (8) | E7520 | 1.86GHz | No | 105 W | 4× QPI 4.8 GT/s | $856 | |||||||
| E6510 | 1.73GHz | 12 MB | $744 | ||||||||||
| Gainestown | DP Server[12] | 4 (8) | LGA 1366 |
Xeon[13] | W5590 | 3.33GHz | Yes | 130 W | 2× QPI 6.4 GT/s | 3×DDR3-13331 | 8 MB | 2009-08-09 | $1600 |
| W5580 | 3.2GHz | 2009-03-29[14] | $1500 | ||||||||||
| X5570 | 2.93GHz | 95 W | $1286 | ||||||||||
| X5560 | 2.8GHz | $1072 | |||||||||||
| X5550 | 2.66GHz | $858 | |||||||||||
| E5540 | 2.53GHz | 80 W | 2× 5.86 GT/s | 3× DDR3-10661 | $744 | ||||||||
| E5530 | 2.4GHz | $530 | |||||||||||
| E5520 | 2.26GHz | $373 | |||||||||||
| L5530 | 2.4GHz | 60 W | 2009-08-09 | $744 | |||||||||
| L5520 | 2.26GHz | 2009-03-30 | $530 | ||||||||||
| L5518 | 2.13GHz | $ | |||||||||||
| 4 (4) | E5507 | 2.26GHz | No | 80 W | 2× 4.8 GT/s | 3× DDR3-8001 | 4 MB | 2010-03-16 | $266 | ||||
| E5506 | 2.13GHz | 2009-03-29 | |||||||||||
| L5506 | 2.13GHz | 60 W | $423 | ||||||||||
| E5504 | 2.0GHz | 80 W | $224 | ||||||||||
| 2 (4) | L5508 | 2.0GHz | Yes | 38 W | 2× 5.86 GT/s | 3× DDR3-1066 | 8 MB | $ | |||||
| 2 (2) | E5503 | 2.0GHz | No | 80 W | 2× 4.8 GT/s | 3× DDR3-800 | 4 MB | 2010-03-16 | $224 | ||||
| E5502 | 1.86GHz | 2009-03-29 | $188 | ||||||||||
| Bloomfield | UP Server[15] | 4 (8) | Xeon[16] | W3580 | 3.33GHz | Yes | 130 W | 1× QPI 6.4 GT/s | 3× DDR3-1333 | 8 MB | 2009-08-09 | $999 | |
| W3570 | 3.2GHz | 2009-03-29[16] | |||||||||||
| W3565 | 3.2GHz | 1× QPI 4.8 GT/s | 3× DDR3-1066 | 2009-11-01 | $562 | ||||||||
| W3550 | 3.06GHz | 2009-08-09 | |||||||||||
| W3540 | 2.93GHz | 2009-03-29[16] | |||||||||||
| W3530 | 2.8GHz | 2010-03-16 | $294 | ||||||||||
| W3520 | 2.66GHz | 2009-03-29[16] | $284 | ||||||||||
| 2(2) | W3505 | 2.53GHz | No | 4 MB | $ | ||||||||
| W3503 | 2.4GHz | $ | |||||||||||
| Lynnfield | 4 (8) | LGA 1156 |
X3480 | 3.06GHz | Yes | 95 W | DMI | 2× DDR3-1333 | 8 MB | 2010-05-30 | $612 | ||
| X3470 | 2.93GHz | 2009-09-08 | $589 | ||||||||||
| X3460 | 2.8GHz | $316 | |||||||||||
| X3450 | 2.66GHz | $241 | |||||||||||
| X3440 | 2.53GHz | $215 | |||||||||||
| L3426 | 1.86GHz | 45 W | $284 | ||||||||||
| 4 (4) | X3430 | 2.4GHz | 95 W | $189 | |||||||||
| Bloomfield | Enthusiast Desktop[17] |
4 (8) | LGA 1366 |
Core i7 Extreme |
975[18] | 3.33GHz | Yes | 130 W | 1× QPI 6.4 GT/s | 3× DDR3-1066 | 2009-05-31 | $999 | |
| 965 | 3.2GHz | 2008-11-17 | |||||||||||
| Core i7 | 960[19] | 3.2GHz | 1× QPI 4.8 GT/s | 2009-10-20 | $562 | ||||||||
| 950[18] | 3.06GHz | 2009-05-31 | |||||||||||
| 940 | 2.93GHz | 2008-11-17 | |||||||||||
| 930 | 2.8GHz | 2010-02-28 | $294 | ||||||||||
| 920 | 2.66GHz | 2008-11-17 | $284 | ||||||||||
| Lynnfield | Performance Desktop |
LGA 1156 |
880 | 3.06GHz | Yes | 95 W | DMI | 2× DDR3-1333 | 2010-05-30 | $583 | |||
| 875K | 2.93GHz | $342 | |||||||||||
| 870[20] | 2009-09-08 | $562 | |||||||||||
| 870S | 2.66GHz | 82 W | 2010-07-19 | $351 | |||||||||
| 860 | 2.8GHz | 95 W | 2009-09-08 | $284 | |||||||||
| 860S | 2.53GHz | 82 W | 2010-01-07 | $337 | |||||||||
| 4 (4) | Core i5 | 760 | 2.8GHz | 95 W | 2010-07-17 | $209 | |||||||
| 750[21] | 2.66GHz | 95 W | 2009-09-08 | $196 | |||||||||
| 750S | 2.4GHz | 82 W | 2010-01-07 | $259 | |||||||||
Intel states the Gainestown processors have six memory channels. Gainestown processors have dual QPI links and have a separate set of memory registers for each link in effect, a multiplexed six-channel system.[22][23]
Mobile processors[edit]
| Codename | Market | Cores / Threads |
Socket | Processor Branding & Model |
Core Clock rate |
Turbo | TDP | L3 cache |
Interface | Release Date | Price for 1k Unit |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarksfield | Extreme / Performance Mobile |
4 (8) | μPGA 988 |
Core i7 Extreme |
940XM | 2.13GHz | Yes | 55 W | 8 MB | * DMI * 2x DDR3-1333 *PCIe1 x16 / 2 x8 |
2010-06-21 | $1096 |
| 920XM | 2.0GHz | 2009-09-23 | $1054 | |||||||||
| Core i7 | 840QM | 1.86GHz | 45 W | 2010-06-21 | $568 | |||||||
| 820QM | 1.73GHz | 2009-09-23 | $546 | |||||||||
| 740QM | 6 MB | 2010-06-21 | $378 | |||||||||
| 720QM | 1.6GHz | 2009-09-23 | $364 | |||||||||
Roadmap[edit]
The main article for thiscategoryisIntel Tick-Tock.
The successor toNehalemandWestmereisSandy Bridge.
|
|||
See also[edit]
List of Intel CPU microarchitectures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westmere_(microarchitecture)
Westmere (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| L1cache | 64KB per core |
|---|---|
| L2 cache | 256KB per core |
| L3 cache | 4MB to 30MB shared |
| GPU | 533 MHz to 900 MHz 177M45nm(K0) |
| Predecessor | Nehalem |
| Successor | Sandy Bridge |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 1156 |
Connection of theGPUinside the Westemere microarchitecture
Westmere(formerlyNehalem-C) is the name given to the32 nmdie shrinkofNehalem. The firstWestmere-based processors were launched on January 7, 2010 by Intel Corporation.
Westmere's feature improvements from Nehalem as reported:
Native six-core (Gulftown) and ten-core (Westmere-EX) processors.[1]
A new set of instructions that gives over 3x the encryption and decryption rate ofAdvanced Encryption Standard(AES) processes compared to before.[2]
Delivers seven new instructions (AES instruction setorAES-NI) that will be used by the AES algorithm. Also an instruction called PCLMULQDQ (seeCLMUL instruction set) that will perform carry-less multiplication for use in cryptography.[3]These instructions will allow the processor to perform hardware-accelerated encryption, not only resulting in faster execution but also protecting against software targeted attacks.
Integrated graphics, added into the processor package (dual coreArrandaleandClarkdaleonly).
Improved virtualization latency.[4]
New virtualization capability: "VMX Unrestricted mode support," which allows 16-bit guests to run (real mode and big real mode).
Support for "Huge Pages" of 1 GB in size.
TLB Sizes[5]
| Cache | Page Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Level | 4 kB | 2 MB | 1 GB |
| DTLB | 1st | 64 | 32 | ? |
| ITLB | 1st | 128 | 7/logical core | ? |
| STLB | 2nd | 512 | none | none |
Contents
[hide]
1CPU Variants
2Westmere CPUs
2.1Server / Desktop Processors
2.2Mobile Processors
3Roadmap
4See also
5References
6External links
CPU Variants[edit]
| Processing Cores (interface) | Process | Die Size | CPUID | Model | Stepping | Mobile | Desktop, UP Server | DP Server | MP Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ten-Core(Quad-channel)[6] | 32nm | 513mm2 | 206F2 | 47 | A2 | Westmere-EX(80615) | |||
| Six-Core(Triple-Channel) | 32nm | 248mm2 | 206C2 | 44 | B1 | Gulftown(80613) | Westmere-EP(80614) | ||
| Dual-Core(Dual-Channel, PCIe, Graphics Core) | 32nm 45nm |
81+114mm2 | 20652 20655 |
37 | C2 K0 |
Arrandale(80617) | Clarkdale(80616) |
Westmere CPUs[edit]
TDPincludes the integrated GPU, if present.
Clarkdale processors feature an integratedPCIe1 ×16.
ClarkdaleandArrandalecontain the 32nm dual core processorHilleland the 45nm integrated graphics deviceIronlake, and support switchable graphics.[7][8]
Server / Desktop Processors[edit]
| Codename | Market | Cores/ Threads |
Socket | Processor Branding & model |
Clock rate | Turbo | TDP | Interfaces | L3 cache |
Release Date |
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core | GPU | Chipset | Memory | |||||||||||
| Westmere-EX [9] |
MP Server | 10 (20) | LGA 1567 |
Xeon | E7-8870 | 2.4GHz | N/A | Yes | 130 W | 4× QPI 6.4 GT/s | 4× DDR3-1066 | 30 MB | 2011-04-05 [10] |
$4616 |
| E7-4870 | $4394 | |||||||||||||
| E7-2870 | $4227 | |||||||||||||
| E7-8867L | 2.13GHz | 105 W | $4172 | |||||||||||
| E7-8860 | 2.26GHz | 130 W | 24 MB | $4061 | ||||||||||
| E7-4860 | $3838 | |||||||||||||
| E7-2860 | $3670 | |||||||||||||
| E7-8850 | 2GHz | $3059 | ||||||||||||
| E7-4850 | $2837 | |||||||||||||
| E7-2850 | $2558 | |||||||||||||
| 8 (8) | E7-8837 | 2.66GHz | $2280 | |||||||||||
| 8 (16) | E7-8830 | 2.13GHz | 105 W | |||||||||||
| E7-4830 | $2059 | |||||||||||||
| E7-2830 | $1779 | |||||||||||||
| E7-4820 | 2GHz | 4× QPI 5.86 GT/s | 18 MB | $1446 | ||||||||||
| E7-2820 | $1334 | |||||||||||||
| 6 (12) | E7-4807 | 1.86GHz | No | 95 W | 4× QPI 4.8 GT/s | 4× DDR3-800 | $890 | |||||||
| E7-2803 | 1.73GHz | 105 W | $774 | |||||||||||
| Gulftown / Westmere-EP [11] |
DP Server | 6 (12) | LGA 1366 |
Xeon | X5690 | 3.46GHz | N/A | Yes | 130 W | 2× QPI 6.4GT/s | 3× DDR3-1333 | 12 MB | 2011-02-13 | $1663 |
| X5680 | 3.33GHz | 2010-03-16 | ||||||||||||
| X5675 | 3.06GHz | 95 W | 2011-02-05 | $1440 | ||||||||||
| X5670 | 2.93GHz | 2010-03-16 | ||||||||||||
| X5660 | 2.8GHz | $1219 | ||||||||||||
| X5650 | 2.66GHz | $996 | ||||||||||||
| E5645 | 2.4GHz | 80 W | 2× QPI 5.86 GT/s | $958 | ||||||||||
| L5640 | 2.26GHz | 60 W | $996 | |||||||||||
| L5638 | 2.0GHz | $958 | ||||||||||||
| 4 (8) | X5677 | 3.46GHz | 130 W | 2× QPI 6.4 GT/s | $1663 | |||||||||
| X5667 | 3.06GHz | 95 W | $1440 | |||||||||||
| E5640 | 2.66GHz | 80 W | 2× QPI 5.86 GT/s | 3× DDR3-1066 | $774 | |||||||||
| E5630 | 2.53GHz | $551 | ||||||||||||
| E5620 | 2.4GHz | $387 | ||||||||||||
| L5630 | 2.13GHz | 40 W | $551 | |||||||||||
| L5618 | 1.86GHz | $530 | ||||||||||||
| 4 (4) | L5609 | 1.86GHz | No | 2× QPI 4.8 GT/s | $440 | |||||||||
| L5607 | 2.26GHz | 80 W | 8 MB | 2011-02-13 | $276 | |||||||||
| L5606 | 2.13GHz | $219 | ||||||||||||
| L5603 | 1.6GHz | 4 MB | $188 | |||||||||||
| UP Server | 6 (12) | Xeon | W3690 | 3.46GHz | N/A | Yes | 130 W | 1× QPI 6.4GT/s | 3×DDR3-1333 | 12 MB | 2011-02-13[12] | $999 | ||
| W3680 | 3.33GHz | 2010-03-16[13] | $999 | |||||||||||
| W3670 | 3.20GHz | 1× QPI 4.8 GT/s | 3× DDR3-1066 | 2010-08-29 | $885 | |||||||||
| Extreme / Performance Desktop |
Core i7 Extreme |
990X | 3.46GHz | 1× QPI 6.4 GT/s | 2011-02-13 | $999 | ||||||||
| 980X | 3.33GHz | 2010-03-16 | ||||||||||||
| Core i7 | 980 | 1× QPI 4.8 GT/s | 2011-06-26 | $583 | ||||||||||
| 970 | 3.20GHz | 2010-07-17 | $583 | |||||||||||
| Clarkdale[14] | UP Server | 2 (4) | LGA 1156 |
Xeon | L3406 | 2.26GHz | N/A | Yes | 30 W | DMI | 2× DDR3-1066 | 4 MB | 2010-03-16 | $189 |
| L3403 | 2.0GHz | 2010-10 | $ | |||||||||||
| Mainstream / Value Desktop |
Core i5 | 680 | 3.6GHz | 733MHz | 73 W | 2× DDR3-1333 | 2010-04-18 | $294 | ||||||
| 670 | 3.46GHz | 2010-01-07 | $284 | |||||||||||
| 661 | 3.33GHz | 900MHz | 87 W | $196 | ||||||||||
| 660 | 733MHz | 73 W | ||||||||||||
| 655K | 3.2GHz | 2010-05-30 | $216 | |||||||||||
| 650 | 2010-01-07 | $176 | ||||||||||||
| Core i3 | 560 | 3.33GHz | No | 2010-08-29 | $138 | |||||||||
| 550 | 3.20GHz | 2010-05-30 | ||||||||||||
| 540 | 3.06GHz | 2010-01-07 | $133 | |||||||||||
| 530 | 2.93GHz | $113 | ||||||||||||
| 2 (2) | Pentium | G6960 | 533MHz | 2× DDR3-1066 | 3 MB | 2011-01-09 | $89 | |||||||
| G6951 | 2.8GHz | Q3 2010 | OEM | |||||||||||
| G6950 | 2010-01-07 | $87 | ||||||||||||
| Celeron | G1101 | 2.26GHz | 2 MB | OEM | ||||||||||
Mobile Processors[edit]
| Codename | Market | Cores/ Threads |
Processor Branding & Model |
CPUClock rate | GPUClock rate | Turbo | TDP | Memory | L3 cache |
Interface | Release Date |
Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Turbo (1C/2C active cores ) |
|||||||||||||
| Arrandale | Mainstream /
Value Mobile |
2 (4) | Core i7 | 640M | 2.8GHz | 3.46/3.2GHz | 766MHz | Yes | 35 W | 2× DDR3-1066 | 4 MB | * DMI *PCIe1 x16 * Socket: μPGA-988/ BGA-1288 |
2010-09-26 | $346 |
| 620M | 2.66GHz | 3.33/3.2GHz | 2010-01-07 | $332 | ||||||||||
| 610E | 2.53GHz | 3.2/2.93GHz | ||||||||||||
| 660LM | 2.26GHz | 3.06/2.8GHz | 566MHz | 25 W | 2010-09-26 | $346 | ||||||||
| 640LM | 2.13GHz | 2.93/2.66GHz | 2010-01-07 | $332 | ||||||||||
| 620LM / 620LE | 2.0GHz | 2.8/2.53GHz | $300 | |||||||||||
| 680UM | 1.46GHz | 2.53/2.16GHz | 500MHz | 18 W | 2× DDR3-800 | 2010-09-26 | $317 | |||||||
| 660UM / 660UE | 1.33GHz | 2.4/2.0GHz | 2010-05-25 | |||||||||||
| 640UM | 1.2GHz | 2.26/1.86GHz | 2010-01-07 | $305 | ||||||||||
| 620UM / 620UE | 1.06GHz | 2.13/1.76GHz | $278 | |||||||||||
| Core i5 | 580M | 2.66GHz | 3.33/2.93GHz | 766MHz | 35 W | 2× DDR3-1066 | 3 MB | 2010-09-26 | $266 | |||||
| 560M | 3.2/2.93GHz | $225 | ||||||||||||
| 540M | 2.53GHz | 3.06/2.8GHz | 2010-01-07 | $257 | ||||||||||
| 520M / 520E | 2.4GHz | 2.93/2.66GHz | $225 | |||||||||||
| 560UM | 1.33GHz | 2.13/1.86GHz | 500MHz | 18 W | 2× DDR3-800 | 2010-09-26 | $250 | |||||||
| 540UM | 1.2GHz | 2.0/1.73GHz | 2010-05-25 | |||||||||||
| 520UM | 1.06GHz | 1.86/1.6GHz | 2010-01-07 | $241 | ||||||||||
| 480M | 2.66GHz | 2.93/2.93GHz | 766MHz | 35 W | 2× DDR3-1066 | 2011-01-09 | OEM | |||||||
| 460M | 2.53GHz | 2.8/2.8GHz | 2010-09-26 | |||||||||||
| 450M | 2.4GHz | 2.66/2.66GHz | 2010-06-26 | |||||||||||
| 430M | 2.26GHz | 2.53/2.53GHz | 2010-01-07 | |||||||||||
| 470UM | 1.33GHz | 1.86/1.6GHz | 500MHz | 18 W | 2× DDR3-800 | 2010-10-01 | ||||||||
| 430UM | 1.2GHz | 1.73/1.46GHz | 2010-05-25 | |||||||||||
| Core i3 | 390 | 2.66GHz | n/a | 667MHz | No | 35 W | 2× DDR3-1066 | 2011-01-09 | ||||||
| 380M | 2.53GHz | 2010-09-26 | ||||||||||||
| 370M | 2.4GHz | 2010-06-20 | ||||||||||||
| 350M | 2.26GHz | 2010-01-07 | ||||||||||||
| 330M / 330E | 2.13GHz | |||||||||||||
| 380UM | 1.33GHz | 500MHz | 18 W | 2× DDR3-800 | 2010-10-01 | |||||||||
| 330UM | 1.2GHz | 2010-05-25 | ||||||||||||
| 2 (2) | Pentium | P6300 | 2.26GHz | 667MHz | 35 W | 2× DDR3-1066 | 2011-01-09 | |||||||
| P6200 | 2.13GHz | 2010-09-26 | ||||||||||||
| P6100 | 2.0GHz | |||||||||||||
| P6000 | 1.86GHz | 2010-06-20 | ||||||||||||
| U5600 | 1.33GHz | 500MHz | 18 W | 2× DDR3-800 | 2011-01-09 | |||||||||
| U5400 | 1.2GHz | 2010-05-25 | ||||||||||||
| Celeron | P4600 | 2.0GHz | 667MHz | 35 W | 2× DDR3-1066 | 2 MB | 2010-09-26 | $86 | ||||||
| P4500 / P4505 | 1.86GHz | 2010-03-28 | OEM | |||||||||||
| U3600 | 1.2GHz | 500MHz | 18 W | 2× DDR3-800 | 2011-01-09 | $134 | ||||||||
| U3400 / U3405 | 1.06GHz | 2× DDR3-800 / 1066 | 2010-05-25 | OEM | ||||||||||
Roadmap[edit]
The main article for thiscategoryisIntel Tick-Tock.
The successor toNehalemandWestmereisSandy Bridge.
See also[edit]
List of Intel CPU microarchitectures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge_(microarchitecture)
Sandy Bridge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSandy Bridge (microarchitecture))
| Max.CPUclock rate | 1.60GHz to 3.60GHz |
|---|---|
| Product code | 80623 (desktop) |
| L1cache | 64KBper core |
| L2 cache | 256KB per core |
| L3 cache | 1MB to 8MB shared 10MB to 15MB (Extreme) 3MB to 20MB (Xeon) |
| GPU | HD Graphics 2000 650MHzto 1250MHz |
| Predecessor | Nehalem (tock) Westmere (tick) |
| Successor | Ivy Bridge (tick) Haswell (tock) |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 1155 |
Bottom view of a Sandy Bridge i7-2600k.
Sandy Bridgeis thecodenamefor amicroarchitecturedeveloped byIntelbeginning in 2005 forcentral processing unitsin computers to replace theNehalemmicroarchitecture. Intel demonstrated a Sandy Bridge processor in 2009, and released first products based on the architecture in January 2011 under theCorebrand.[1][2]
Sandy Bridge implementations targeted a32 nanometermanufacturing process based onplanar double-gate transistors.[3]Intel's subsequent product, codenamedIvy Bridge, uses a22 nanometerprocess. TheIvy Bridgedie shrink, known in theIntel Tick-Tockmodel as the "tick", is based onFinFET(non-planar, "3D")tri-gate transistors. Intel demonstrated theIvy Bridgeprocessors in 2011.[4]
Contents
[hide]
1Technology
2Models and steppings
3Performance
4List of Sandy Bridge processors
4.1Desktop platform
4.2Server platform
4.3Mobile platform
5Cougar Point chipset flaw
6Limitations
6.1Overclocking
6.2Chipset
7vPro remote-control (Intel Insider)
8Software development kit
9Roadmap
10See also
11References
12External links
Technology[edit]
Developed primarily by theIsraelbranch ofIntel, the codename was originally "Gesher" (meaning "bridge" inHebrew). The name was changed to avoid being associated with the defunctGesher political party;[5]the decision was led by Ron Friedman, vice president of Intel managing the group at the time.[1]Intel demonstrated a Sandy Bridge processor with A1steppingat 2GHzduring theIntel Developer Forumin September 2009.[6]
Upgraded features from Nehalem include:
32KB data + 32KB instructionL1 cache(3clocks) and 256KBL2 cache(8clocks) per core.
Shared L3cache includes the processor graphics (LGA 1155).
64-bytecacheline size.
Two load/store operations perCPU cyclefor each memory channel.
Decodedmicro-operation cache(uop cache) and enlarged, optimizedbranch predictor.
Improved performance fortranscendental mathematics,AES encryption(AES instruction set), andSHA-1hashing.
256-bit/cycle ring bus interconnect between cores, graphics, cache and System Agent Domain.
Advanced Vector Extensions(AVX) 256-bit instruction set with wider vectors, new extensible syntax and rich functionality.
Intel Quick Sync Video, hardware support for video encoding and decoding.
Up to 8 physical cores or 16 logical cores throughHyper-threading.
Integration of the GMCH (integrated graphics and memory controller) and processor into a single die inside the processor package. In contrast, Sandy Bridge's predecessor,Clarkdale, has two separate dies (one for GMCH, one for processor) within the processor package. This tighter integration reduces memory latency even more.
A 14- to 19-stageinstruction pipeline, depending on the micro-operation cache hit or miss.[7]
| Cache | Page Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Level | 4KB | 2MB | 1GB |
| DTLB | 1st | 64 | 32 | 4 |
| ITLB | 1st | 128 | 8 / logical core | none |
| STLB | 2nd | 512 | none | none |
All translation lookaside buffers (TLBs) are 4-wayassociative.[10]
Models and steppings[edit]
All Sandy Bridge processors with one, two, or four cores report the same CPUID model 0206A7h[11]and are closely related. The stepping number can not be seen from the CPUID but only from the PCI configuration space. The later Sandy Bridge-E processors with up to eight cores and no graphics are using CPUIDs 0206D6h and 0206D7h.[12]Ivy Bridge CPUs all have CPUID 0306A9h to date, and are built in four different configurations differing in the number of cores, L3 cache and GPU execution units.
| Die Code Name | CPUID | Stepping | Die size | Transistors | Cores | GPU EUs | L3 Cache | Sockets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandy Bridge-HE-4 | 0206A7h | D2 | 216mm2 | 1.16 billion | 4 | 12 | 8MB | LGA 1155,Socket G2,BGA-1224,BGA-1023 |
| Sandy Bridge-H-2 | J1 | 149mm2 | 624 million | 2 | 4MB | LGA 1155,Socket G2,BGA-1023 | ||
| Sandy Bridge-M-2 | Q0 | 131mm2 | 504 million | 6 | 3MB | |||
| Sandy Bridge-EP-8 | 0206D6h | C1 | 435mm2 | 2.27 billion | 8 | N/A | 20MB | LGA 2011 |
| 0206D7h | C2 | |||||||
| Sandy Bridge-EP-4 | 0206D6h | M0 | 294mm2 | 1.27 billion | 4 | N/A | 10MB | LGA 2011 |
| 0206D7h | M1 | |||||||
| Ivy Bridge-M-2 | 0306A9h | P0 | 94mm2[13] | 2 | 6[14] | 3MB[15] | LGA 1155, Socket G2, BGA-1224, BGA-1023 |
|
| Ivy Bridge-H-2 | L1 | 118mm2[13] | 2 | 16 | 4MB | |||
| Ivy Bridge-HE-4 | E1 | 160mm2[13] | 1.4billion[16] | 4 | 16 | 8MB | ||
| IvyBridge-HM-4 | N0 | 133mm2[13] | 4 | 6 | 6MB[15] |
Performance[edit]
The average performance increase, according to IXBT Labs and Semi Accurate as well as many other benchmarking sites, at clock to clock is 11.3% compared to the Nehalem Generation, which includes Bloomfield, Clarkdale, andLynnfieldprocessors.[17]
Around twice the integrated graphics performance compared toClarkdale's(12EUscomparison).
List of Sandy Bridge processors[edit]
1Processors featuring Intel's HD 3000 graphics are set inbold. Other processors feature HD 2000 graphics or no graphics core (Graphics Clock rate indicated by N/A).
This list may not contain all the Sandy Bridge processors released by Intel. A more complete listing can be found on Intel's website.
Desktop platform[edit]
[18][19][20]
| Target segment |
Processor Branding & Model |
Cores (Threads) |
CPUClock rate | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date (Y-M-D) |
Price (USD) |
Motherboard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Socket | Interface | Memory | ||||||||
| Extreme / High-End |
Core i7 Extreme |
3970X | 6 (12) | 3.5GHz | 4.0GHz | N/A | 15MB | 150W | 2012-11-12 | $999 | LGA 2011 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 2.0[21] |
Up to quad channel DDR3-1600[22] |
|
| 3960X | 3.3GHz | 3.9GHz | 130W | 2011-11-14 | ||||||||||
| Core i7 | 3930K | 3.2GHz | 3.8GHz | 12MB | $583 | |||||||||
| 3820 | 4 (8) | 3.6GHz | 10MB | 2012-02-13[23] | $294 | |||||||||
| Performance | 2700K | 3.5GHz | 3.9GHz | 850MHz | 1350MHz | 8MB | 95W | 2011-10-24 | $332 | LGA 1155 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 2.0 |
Up to dual channel DDR3-1333 |
||
| 2600K | 3.4GHz | 3.8GHz | 2011-01-09 | $317 | ||||||||||
| 2600 | $294 | |||||||||||||
| 2600S | 2.8GHz | 65 W | $306 | |||||||||||
| Core i5 | 2550K | 4 (4) | 3.4GHz | N/A | 6MB | 95W | 2012-01-30 | $225 | ||||||
| 2500K | 3.3GHz | 3.7GHz | 850MHz | 1100MHz | 2011-01-09 | $216 | ||||||||
| 2500 | $205 | |||||||||||||
| 2500S | 2.7GHz | 65 W | $216 | |||||||||||
| 2500T | 2.3GHz | 3.3GHz | 650MHz | 1250MHz | 45 W | |||||||||
| 2450P | 3.2GHz | 3.5GHz | N/A | 95 W | 2012-01-30 | $195 | ||||||||
| 2400 | 3.1GHz | 3.4GHz | 850MHz | 1100MHz | 2011-01-09 | $184 | ||||||||
| 2405S | 2.5GHz | 3.3GHz | 65 W | 2011-05-22 | $205 | |||||||||
| 2400S | 2011-01-09 | $195 | ||||||||||||
| 2380P | 3.1GHz | 3.4GHz | N/A | 95 W | 2012-01-30 | $177 | ||||||||
| 2320 | 3.0GHz | 3.3GHz | 850MHz | 1100MHz | 2011-09-04 | |||||||||
| 2310 | 2.9GHz | 3.2GHz | 2011-05-22 | |||||||||||
| 2300 | 2.8GHz | 3.1GHz | 2011-01-09 | |||||||||||
| Mainstream | 2390T | 2 (4) | 2.7GHz | 3.5GHz | 650MHz | 3MB | 35W | 2011-02-20 | $195 | |||||
| Core i3 | 2120T | 2.6GHz | N/A | 2011-09-04 | $127 | |||||||||
| 2100T | 2.5GHz | 2011-02-20 | ||||||||||||
| 2115C | 2.0GHz | N/A | 25 W | 2012-05 | $241 | BGA 1284 |
||||||||
| 2130 | 3.4GHz | 850MHz | 1100MHz | 65 W | 2011-09-04 | $138 | LGA 1155 |
|||||||
| 2125 | 3.3GHz | $134 | ||||||||||||
| 2120 | 2011-02-20 | $138 | ||||||||||||
| 2105 | 3.1GHz | 2011-05-22 | $134 | |||||||||||
| 2102 | Q2 2011 | $127 | ||||||||||||
| 2100 | 2011-02-20 | $117 | ||||||||||||
| Pentium | G870 | 2 (2) | 2012-06-03 | $86 | ||||||||||
| G860 | 3.0GHz | 2011-09-04 | ||||||||||||
| G860T | 2.6GHz | 650MHz | 35 W | 2012-06-03 | $75 | |||||||||
| G850 | 2.9GHz | 850MHz | 65 W | 2011-05-24 | $86 | |||||||||
| G840 | 2.8GHz | $75 | ||||||||||||
| G645 | 2.9GHz | 09-03-2012 | $64 | Up to dual channel DDR3-1066 |
||||||||||
| G640 | 2.8GHz | 06-03-2012 | ||||||||||||
| G632 | 2.7GHz | Q3 2011 | ||||||||||||
| G630 | 2011-09-04 | $75 | ||||||||||||
| G622 | 2.6GHz | Q2 2011 | ||||||||||||
| G620 | 2011-05-24 | $64 | ||||||||||||
| G645T | 2.5GHz | 650MHz | 35 W | 09-03-2012 | ||||||||||
| G640T | 2.4GHz | 06-03-2012 | ||||||||||||
| G630T | 2.3GHz | 2011-09-04 | $70 | |||||||||||
| G620T | 2.2GHz | 2011-05-24 | ||||||||||||
| Celeron | G555 | 2.7GHz | 850MHz | 1000MHz | 2MB | 65W | 2012-09-02 | $52 | ||||||
| G550 | 2.6GHz | 2012-06-03 | ||||||||||||
| G540 | 2.5GHz | 2011-09-04 | ||||||||||||
| G530 | 2.4GHz | $42 | ||||||||||||
| G550T | 2.2GHz | 650MHz | 35 W | 2012-09-02 | ||||||||||
| G540T | 2.1GHz | 2012-06-03 | ||||||||||||
| G530T | 2.0GHz | 2011-09-04 | $47 | |||||||||||
| G470 | 1 (2) | 1.5MB | 2013-06-09 | $37 | Up to dual channel DDR3-1333 |
|||||||||
| G465 | 1.9GHz | 2012-09-02 | Up to dual channel DDR3-1066 |
|||||||||||
| G460 | 1.8GHz | 2011-12-11 | ||||||||||||
| G440 | 1 (1) | 1.6GHz | 1MB | 2011-09-04 | ||||||||||
| Target segment |
Processor Branding & Model |
Cores (Threads) |
CPUClock rate | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date (Y-M-D) |
Price (USD) |
Motherboard | |||||
| Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Socket | Interface | Memory | ||||||||
Suffixes to denote:
K – Unlocked(adjustable CPU ratio up to 57 bins)
P – Versions clocked slightly higher than similar models, but with onboard-graphics deactivated.
S – Performance-optimized lifestyle(low power with 65W TDP)
T – Power-optimized lifestyle(ultra low power with 35-45W TDP)
X – Extreme performance(adjustable CPU ratio with no ratio limit)
NOTE:3960X,3930Kand3820are actually ofSandy Bridge-Eedition.
Server platform[edit]
| Target Segment |
Socket | Processor Branding & Model |
Cores (Threads) |
CPUClock rate | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
Interface | Supported Memory |
TDP | Release Date |
Price (USD) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | |||||||||||
| 4P Server | LGA 2011 |
Xeon E5 | 4650 | 8 (16) | 2.7GHz | 3.3GHz | N/A | 20MB | 2×QPI DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0 |
4x DDR3-1600 | 130W | 2012-05-14 | $3616 | |
| 4650L | 2.6GHz | 3.1GHz | 115W | |||||||||||
| 4640 | 2.4GHz | 2.8GHz | 95W | $2725 | ||||||||||
| 4620 | 2.2GHz | 2.6GHz | 16MB | 4x DDR3-1333 | $1611 | |||||||||
| 4617 | 6 (6) | 2.9GHz | 3.4GHz | 15MB | 4x DDR3-1600 | 130W | ||||||||
| 4610 | 6 (12) | 2.4GHz | 2.9GHz | 4x DDR3-1333 | 95W | $1219 | ||||||||
| 4607 | 2.2GHz | N/A | 12MB | 4x DDR3-1066 | $885 | |||||||||
| 4603 | 4 (8) | 2.0GHz | 10MB | $551 | ||||||||||
| 2P Server | 2687W | 8 (16) | 3.1GHz | 3.8GHz | 20MB | 4x DDR3-1600 | 150W | 2012-03-06 | $1885 | |||||
| 2690 | 2.9GHz | 3.8GHz | 135W | $2057 | ||||||||||
| 2680 | 2.7GHz | 3.5GHz | 130W | $1723 | ||||||||||
| 2670 | 2.6GHz | 3.3GHz | 115W | $1552 | ||||||||||
| 2665 | 2.4GHz | 3.1GHz | $1440 | |||||||||||
| 2660 | 2.2GHz | 3.0GHz | 95W | $1329 | ||||||||||
| 2658 | 2.1GHz | 2.4GHz | $1186 | |||||||||||
| 2650 | 2.0GHz | 2.8GHz | $1107 | |||||||||||
| 2650L | 1.8GHz | 2.3GHz | 70W | |||||||||||
| 2648L | 1.8GHz | 2.1GHz | $1186 | |||||||||||
| 2667 | 6 (12) | 2.9GHz | 3.5GHz | 15MB | 130W | $1552 | ||||||||
| 2640 | 2.5GHz | 3.0GHz | 4x DDR3-1333 | 95W | $884 | |||||||||
| 2630 | 2.3GHz | 2.8GHz | $612 | |||||||||||
| 2620 | 2.0GHz | 2.5GHz | $406 | |||||||||||
| 2630L | 2.0GHz | 2.5GHz | 60W | $662 | ||||||||||
| 2643 | 4 (8) | 3.3GHz | 3.5GHz | 10MB | 4x DDR3-1600 | 130W | $884 | |||||||
| 2609 | 4 (4) | 2.4GHz | N/A | 4x DDR3-1066 | 80 W | $246 | ||||||||
| 2603 | 1.8GHz | $202 | ||||||||||||
| 2637 | 2 (4) | 3.0GHz | 3.5GHz | 5 MB | 4x DDR3-1600 | $884 | ||||||||
| LGA 1356 |
2470 | 8 (16) | 2.3GHz | 3.1GHz | 20 MB | 1× QPI DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0 |
3x DDR3-1600 | 95 W | 2012-05-14 | $1440 | ||||
| 2450 | 2.1GHz | 2.9GHz | $1106 | |||||||||||
| 2450L | 1.8GHz | 2.3GHz | 70 W | |||||||||||
| 2440 | 6 (12) | 2.4GHz | 2.9GHz | 15 MB | 3x DDR3-1333 | 95 W | $834 | |||||||
| 2430 | 2.2GHz | 2.7GHz | $551 | |||||||||||
| 2420 | 1.9GHz | 2.4GHz | $388 | |||||||||||
| 2430L | 2.0GHz | 2.5GHz | 60 W | $662 | ||||||||||
| 2407 | 4 (4) | 2.2GHz | N/A | 10 MB | 3x DDR3-1066 | 80 W | $250 | |||||||
| 2403 | 1.8GHz | $192 | ||||||||||||
| 1P Server | LGA 2011 |
1660 | 6 (12) | 3.3GHz | 3.9GHz | 15 MB | 2×QPI DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0 |
Up to quad channel DDR3-1600 |
130 W | 2012-03-06 | $1080 | |||
| 1650 | 3.2GHz | 3.8GHz | 12 MB | $583 | ||||||||||
| 1620 | 4 (8) | 3.6GHz | 3.8GHz | 10 MB | $294 | |||||||||
| 1607 | 4 (4) | 3.0GHz | N/A | Up to quad channel DDR3-1066 |
$244 | |||||||||
| 1603 | 2.8GHz | $198 | ||||||||||||
| LGA 1356 |
1428L | 6 (12) | 1.8GHz | N/A | 15 MB | 1× QPI DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0 |
3x DDR3-1333 | 60 W | Q2 2012 | $395 | ||||
| 1410 | 4 (8) | 2.8GHz | 3.2GHz | 10 MB | 80 W | 2012-05-14 | ||||||||
| Pentium | 1407 | 2 (2) | N/A | 5 MB | 3x DDR3-1066 | |||||||||
| 1405 | 1.2GHz | 1.8GHz | 40 W | August 2012 | $143 | |||||||||
| 1403 | 2.6GHz | N/A | 80 W | 2012-05-14 | ||||||||||
| LGA 1155 |
Xeon E3 | 1290 | 4 (8) | 3.6GHz | 4.0GHz | 8 MB | DMI 2.0 PCIe 2.0 |
Up to dual channel DDR3-1333 |
95 W | 2011-05-29 | $885 | |||
| 1280 | 3.5GHz | 3.9GHz | 2011-04-03 | $612 | ||||||||||
| 1275 | 3.4GHz | 3.8GHz | 850MHz | 1350MHz | $339 | |||||||||
| 1270 | N/A | 80 W | $328 | |||||||||||
| 1260L | 2.4GHz | 3.3GHz | 650MHz | 1250MHz | 45 W | $294 | ||||||||
| 1245 | 3.3GHz | 3.7GHz | 850MHz | 1350MHz | 95 W | $262 | ||||||||
| 1240 | N/A | 80 W | $250 | |||||||||||
| 1235 | 3.2GHz | 3.6GHz | 850MHz | 1350MHz | 95 W | $240 | ||||||||
| 1230 | N/A | 80 W | $215 | |||||||||||
| 1225 | 4 (4) | 3.1GHz | 3.4GHz | 850MHz | 1350MHz | 6 MB | 95 W | $194 | ||||||
| 1220 | N/A | 8 MB | 80 W | $189 | ||||||||||
| 1220L | 2 (4) | 2.2GHz | 3 MB | 20 W | ||||||||||
| BGA 1284 |
1125C | 4 (8) | 2.0GHz | N/A | 8 MB | Up to dual channel DDR3-1600 |
40 W | May 2012 | $444 | |||||
| 1105C | 1.0GHz | 6 MB | 25 W | $333 | ||||||||||
| LGA 1155 |
Pentium | 350 | 2 (4) | 1.2GHz | 3 MB | Up to dual channel DDR3-1333 |
15 W | November 2011 | $159 | |||||
| BGA 1284 |
Celeron | 725C | 1 (2) | 1.3GHz | 1.5 MB | 10 W | May 2012 | $74 | ||||||
Mobile platform[edit]
Core i5-2515E and Core i7-2715QE processors have support for ECC memory and PCI express port bifurcation.
All mobile processors, exceptCeleronandPentium, use Intel's Graphics sub-system HD 3000 (12 EUs).
| Target Segment |
Processor Branding & Model |
Cores / Threads |
CPUClock rate | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date |
Price (USD) |
Motherboard | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Turbo (1C/2C/4C) |
Normal | Turbo | Interface | Socket | ||||||||
| Extreme | Core i7 Extreme |
2960XM | 4 (8) | 2.7GHz | 3.7/3.6/3.4GHz | 650MHz | 1300MHz | 8 MB | 55 W | 2011-09-04 | $1096 | *DMI 2.0 *Memory: Up to dual channel DDR3-1600MHz *PCIe 2.0 |
Socket G2/ BGA-1224 (in embedded products)[24] |
| 2920XM | 2.5GHz | 3.5/3.4/3.2GHz | 2011-01-05 | ||||||||||
| Performance | Core i7 | 2860QM | 2.5GHz | 3.6/3.5/3.3GHz | 45 W | 2011-09-04 | $568 | ||||||
| 2820QM | 2.3GHz | 3.4/3.3/3.1GHz | 2011-01-05 | ||||||||||
| 2760QM | 2.4GHz | 3.5/3.4/3.2GHz | 6 MB | 2011-09-04 | $378 | ||||||||
| 2720QM | 2.2GHz | 3.3/3.2/3.0GHz | 2011-01-05 | ||||||||||
| 2715QE | 2.1GHz | 3.0/2.9/2.7GHz | 1200MHz | ||||||||||
| 2710QE | |||||||||||||
| 2675QM | 2.2GHz | 3.1/3.0/2.8GHz | 1200MHz | 2011-10-02 | *DMI 2.0 *Memory: Up to dual channel DDR3-1333MHz *PCIe 2.0 |
||||||||
| 2670QM | 1100MHz | ||||||||||||
| 2635QM | 2.0GHz | 2.9/2.8/2.6GHz | 1200MHz | 2011-01-05 | |||||||||
| 2630QM | 1100MHz | ||||||||||||
| Mainstream | 2640M | 2 (4) | 2.8GHz | 3.5/3.3GHz | 1300MHz | 4 MB | 35 W | 2011-09-04 | $346 | Socket G2/ BGA-1023 (in embedded products)[24] |
|||
| 2620M | 2.7GHz | 3.4/3.2GHz | 2011-02-20 | ||||||||||
| 2649M | 2.3GHz | 3.2/2.9GHz | 500MHz | 1100MHz | 25 W | ||||||||
| 2629M | 2.1GHz | 3.0/2.7GHz | $311 | ||||||||||
| 2655LE | 2.2GHz | 2.9/2.7GHz | 650MHz | 1000MHz | $346 | ||||||||
| 2677M | 1.8GHz | 2.9/2.6GHz | 350MHz | 1200MHz | 17 W | 2011-06-20 | $317 | ||||||
| 2637M | 1.7GHz | 2.8/2.5GHz | $289 | ||||||||||
| 2657M | 1.6GHz | 2.7/2.4GHz | 1000MHz | 2011-02-20 | $317 | ||||||||
| 2617M | 1.5GHz | 2.6/2.3GHz | 950MHz | $289 | |||||||||
| 2610UE | 2.4/2.1GHz | 850MHz | $317 | ||||||||||
| Core i5 | 2557M | 1.7GHz | 2.7/2.4GHz | 1200MHz | 3 MB | 2011-06-20 | $250 | ||||||
| 2537M | 1.4GHz | 2.3/2.0GHz | 900MHz | 2011-02-20 | |||||||||
| 2467M | 1.6GHz | 2.3/2.0GHz | 1150MHz | 2011-06-19 | |||||||||
| 2540M | 2.6GHz | 3.3/3.1GHz | 650MHz | 1300MHz | 35 W | 2011-06-20 | $266 | ||||||
| 2520M | 2.5GHz | 3.2/3.0GHz | $225 | ||||||||||
| 2515E | 3.1/2.8GHz | 1100MHz | $266 | ||||||||||
| 2510E | |||||||||||||
| 2450M | 1300MHz | 2012-01 | $225 | ||||||||||
| 2435M | 2.4GHz | 3.0/2.7GHz | 2011-10-02 | OEM | |||||||||
| 2430M | 1200MHz | $225 | |||||||||||
| 2410M | 2.3GHz | 2.9/2.6GHz | 2011-06-20 | ||||||||||
| Core i3 | 2370M | 2.4GHz | N/A | 1150MHz | 2012-01 | ||||||||
| 2350M | 2.3GHz | 2011-10-02 | |||||||||||
| 2348M | 2013-01 | OEM | |||||||||||
| 2330E | 2.2GHz | 1050MHz | 2011-06-19 | $225 | |||||||||
| 2330M | 1100MHz | ||||||||||||
| 2328M | 2012-09 | ||||||||||||
| 2312M | 2.1GHz | Q2 2011 | OEM | ||||||||||
| 2310E | 1050MHz | 2011-02-20 | |||||||||||
| 2310M | 1100MHz | ||||||||||||
| 2377M | 1.5GHz | 350MHz | 1000MHz | 17 W | Q3 2012 | $225 | |||||||
| 2375M | 2012-03 | ||||||||||||
| 2367M | 1.4GHz | 2011-10-02 | $250 | ||||||||||
| 2365M | 2012-09 | $225 | |||||||||||
| 2357M | 1.3GHz | 950MHz | 2011-06-19 | OEM | |||||||||
| 2340UE | 800MHz | $250 | |||||||||||
| Pentium | B915C | 1.5GHz | N/A | 15 W | 2012-05 | $138 | |||||||
| 997 | 2 (2) | 1.6GHz | 350MHz | 1000MHz | 2 MB | 17 W | 2012-09-30 | $134 | |||||
| 987 | 1.5GHz | Q3 2012 | |||||||||||
| 977 | 1.4GHz | 2012-01 | |||||||||||
| 967 | 1.3GHz | 2011-10-02 | OEM | ||||||||||
| 957 | 1.2GHz | 800MHz | 2011-06-19 | $134 | |||||||||
| B980 | 2.4GHz | 650MHz | 1150MHz | 35 W | 2012-09 | OEM | |||||||
| B970 | 2.3GHz | 2012-01 | $125 | ||||||||||
| B960 | 2.2GHz | 1100MHz | 2011-10-02 | $134 | |||||||||
| B950 | 2.1GHz | 2011-06-19 | |||||||||||
| B940 | 2.0GHz | ||||||||||||
| Celeron | B840 | 1.9GHz | 1000MHz | 2011-09-04 | $86 | ||||||||
| B830 | 1.8GHz | 1050MHz | 2012-09-30 | ||||||||||
| B820[25] | 1.7GHz | 2012-07-29 | |||||||||||
| B815[26] | 1.6GHz | 2012-01 | |||||||||||
| B810E | 1000MHz | 2011-06-19 | |||||||||||
| B810 | 950MHz | 2011-03-13 | |||||||||||
| B800 | 1.5GHz | 1000MHz | 2011-06-19 | $80 | |||||||||
| 887 | 350MHz | 17 W | 09-30-2012 | $86 | |||||||||
| 877 | 1.4GHz | 2012-07-29 | |||||||||||
| 867 | 1.3GHz | January 2012 | $134 | ||||||||||
| 857 | 1.2GHz | 2011-07-03 | |||||||||||
| 847 | 1.1GHz | 800MHz | 2011-06-19 | ||||||||||
| 847E | |||||||||||||
| 807 | 1 (2) | 1.5GHz | 950MHz | 1.5 MB | 2012-07-29 | $70 | |||||||
| 725C | 1.3GHz | N/A | 10 W | 2012-05 | $74 | ||||||||
| 827E | 1 (1) | 1.4GHz | 350MHz | 800MHz | 17 W | 2011-07-03 | $107 | ||||||
| 797 | 950MHz | 2012-01 | |||||||||||
| 787 | 1.3GHz | 2011-07-03 | |||||||||||
| B730 | 1.8GHz | 650MHz | 1000MHz | 35 W | 2012-07-29 | $70 | |||||||
| B720[27] | 1.7GHz | 2012-01 | |||||||||||
| B710 | 1.6GHz | 2011-06-19 | |||||||||||
| 807UE | 1.0GHz | 350MHz | 800MHz | 1 MB | 10 W | 2011-11 | $117 | ||||||
Suffixes to denote:
M – Mobile processors
XM – Unlocked
QM – Quad-core
E – Embedded mobile processors
QE – Quad-core
LE – Performance-optimized
UE – Power-optimized
Cougar Point chipset flaw[edit]
On January 31, 2011, Intel issued a recall on all 67-series motherboards due to a flaw in theCougar PointChipset.[28]A hardware problem, in which the chipset's SATA-II ports may fail over time, cause failure of connection to SATA-II devices, though data is not at risk.[29]Intel claims that this problem will affect only 5% of users over 3 years, however, heavier I/O workloads can exacerbate the problem.
Intel stopped production of flawed B2 stepping chipsets and began producing B3 stepping chipsets with the silicon fix. Shipping of these new chipsets started on 14 February 2011 and Intel estimated full recovery volume in April 2011.[30]Motherboard manufacturers (such asASUSandGigabyte Technology) and computer manufacturers (such asDellandHewlett-Packard) stopped selling products that involved the flawed chipset and offered support for affected customers. Options ranged from swapping for B3 motherboards to product refunds.[31][32]
Sandy Bridge processor sales were temporarily on hold, as one cannot use the CPU without a motherboard. However, processor release dates were not affected.[33]After two weeks, Intel continued shipping some chipsets, but manufacturers had to agree to a set of terms that will prevent customers from encountering the bug.[34]
Limitations[edit]
Overclocking[edit]
With Sandy Bridge, Intel has tied the speed of every bus (USB, SATA, PCI, PCI-E, CPU cores, Uncore, memory etc.) to a single internal clock generator issuing the basic100 MHzBase Clock (BClk).[35]With CPUs being multiplier locked, the only way to overclock is to increase the BClk, which can be raised by only 5–7% without other hardware components failing. As a work around, Intel made available K/X-series processors, which feature unlocked multipliers; with a multiplier cap of 57 for Sandy Bridge.[36]For the Sandy Bridge E platform, there is alternative method known as the BClk ratio overclock.[37]
During IDF (Intel Developer Forum) 2010, Intel demonstrated an unknown Sandy Bridge CPU running stably overclocked at 4.9GHz on air cooling.[38][39]
Chipset[edit]
Non-K edition CPUs can overclock up to four bins from its turbo multiplier. Referherefor chipset support.
vPro remote-control (Intel Insider)[edit]
Sandy and Ivy Bridge processors withvProcapability have security features that can remotely disable a PC or erase information from hard drives. This can be useful in the case of a lost or stolen PC. The commands can be received through 3G signals, Ethernet, or Internet connections. AES encryption acceleration will be available, which can be useful for video conferencing and VoIP applications.[40][41]
Software development kit[edit]
With the introduction of the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture, Intel also introduced theIntel Data Plane Development Kit(Intel DPDK) to help developers of communications applications take advantage of the platform inpacket processingapplications, andnetwork processors.[42]
Roadmap[edit]
Intel demonstrated theHaswellarchitecture in September 2011, released in 2013 as the successor toSandy BridgeandIvy Bridge.[43]
|
|||
See also[edit]
Accelerated Processing Unit
List of Intel CPU microarchitectures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture)
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| CPUID code | 0306A9h |
|---|---|
| Product code | 80637 (desktop) |
| L1cache | 64KBper core |
| L2 cache | 256KB per core |
| L3 cache | 2MBto 8MB shared |
| GPU | HD Graphics 2500 650MHz to 1150MHz HD Graphics 4000 350MHz to 1300MHz HD Graphics P4000 650MHz to 1250MHz |
| Predecessor | Sandy Bridge |
| Successor | Haswell |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 1155 |
Ivy Bridgeis thecodenamefor a line of processors based on the 22nm manufacturing process developed byIntel. The name is also applied more broadly to the22nmdie shrinkof theSandy Bridgemicroarchitecture based onFinFET("3D")tri-gate transistors, which is also used in theXeonandCore i7Ivy Bridge-EX(Ivytown),Ivy Bridge-EPandIvy Bridge-Emicroprocessors released in 2013.
Ivy Bridge processors are backwards compatible with the SandyBridge platform, but such systems might require a firmware update (vendor specific).[1]In 2011, Intel released the 7-seriesPanther Pointchipsetswith integratedUSB 3.0to complement IvyBridge.[2]
Volume production of IvyBridge chips began in the third quarter of 2011.[3]Quad-coreand dual-core-mobile models launched on April 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 respectively.[4]Corei3 desktop processors, as well as the first 22nmPentium, were announced and available the first week of September, 2012.[5]
Contents
[hide]
1Overview
2Ivy Bridge features and performance
2.1Benchmark comparisons
2.2Thermal performance and heat issues
2.3Models and steppings
3Ivy Bridge-E features
3.1Models and Steppings
4List of Ivy Bridge and Ivy Bridge-E processors
4.1Desktop processors
4.2Server processors
4.3Mobile processors
5Roadmap
6See also
7References
8External links
Overview[edit]
The IvyBridge CPU microarchitecture is a shrink from SandyBridge and remains largely unchanged.
Notable improvements include:[6][7]
22nmTri-gate transistor("3-D") technology (up to 50% less power consumption at the same performance level as 2-D planar transistors).[8]
A new random number generator and theRdRandinstruction,[9]codenamed Bull Mountain.[10]
Ivy Bridge features and performance[edit]
The mobile and desktop IvyBridge chips also include significant changes over SandyBridge:
F16C(16-bit Floating-point conversion instructions).
RdRandinstruction (Intel Secure Key).
PCI Express 3.0support (not on Corei3 and ULV processors).[11]
MaxCPU multiplierof 63 (57 for Sandy Bridge).[12]
RAM support up to 2800MT/sin 200MHz increments.[12]
The built-inGPUhas 6 or 16execution units(EUs), compared to SandyBridge's 6 or 12.[13]
Intel HD GraphicswithDirectX 11,OpenGL 3.1, andOpenCL 1.1support.[14]OpenGL 4.0 is supported with 9.18.10.3071 WHQL drivers[15]and later drivers.
DDR3Land Configurable TDP (cTDP) for mobile processors.[16]
Multiple4Kvideo playback.
Intel Quick Sync Videoversion 2.[13]
Up to three displays are supported (with some limitations: with chipset of 7-series and using two of them with DisplayPort or eDP).[17]
A 14- to 19-stageinstruction pipeline, depending on themicro-operation cachehit or miss.[18]
| Cache | Page Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Level | 4KB | 2MB | 1GB |
| DTLB | 1st | 64 | 32 | 4 |
| ITLB | 1st | 128 | 8 / logical core | none |
| STLB | 2nd | 512 | none | none |
Benchmark comparisons[edit]
Compared to Sandy Bridge:
3% to 5% increase in CPU performance when compared clock for clock[21][22]
25% to 68% increase in integrated GPU performance.[23]
Thermal performance and heat issues[edit]
Ivy Bridge's temperatures are reportedly 10°C higher compared to Sandy Bridge when overclocked, even at default voltage setting.[24]Impress PC Watch, a Japanese website, performed experiments that confirmed earlier speculations that this is because Intel used a poor quality (and perhaps lower cost)thermal interface material(thermal paste, or "TIM") between the chip and theheat spreader, instead of thefluxlesssolder of previous generations.[25][26][27]The mobile Ivy Bridge processors are not affected by this issue because they do not use a heat spreader between the chip and cooling system.
Enthusiast reports describe the TIM used by Intel as low-quality,[27]and not up to par for a "premium" CPU, with some speculation that this is by design to encourage sales of prior processors.[25]Further analyses caution that the processor can be damaged or void its warranty if home users attempt to remedy the matter.[25][28]The TIM has much lowerthermal conductivity, causing heat to trap on the die.[24]Experiments replacing this with a higher quality TIM or other heat removal methods showed a substantial temperature drop, and improvements to the voltages and clocking sustainable by IvyBridge chips.[25][29]
Intel claims that the smaller die of IvyBridge and the related increase in thermal density is expected to result in higher temperatures when the CPU is overclocked; Intel also stated that this is as expected and will likely not improve in future revisions.[30]
Models and steppings[edit]
All Ivy Bridge processors with one, two, or four cores report the same CPUID model 0x000306A9, and are built in four different configurations differing in the number of cores, L3 cache and GPU execution units.
| Die Code Name | CPUID | Stepping | Die Size | Die Dimensions | Transistors | Cores | GPU EUs | L3 Cache | Sockets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivy Bridge-M-2 | 0x000306A9 | P0 | 94mm2[31] | 7.656 x 12.223 mm | 2 | 6[32] | 3MB[33] | LGA 1155, Socket G2, BGA-1224, BGA-1023 |
|
| Ivy Bridge-H-2 | L1 | 118mm2[31] | 8.141 x 14.505 mm | 2 | 16 | 4MB | |||
| Ivy Bridge-HE-4 | E1 | 160mm2[31] | 8.141 x 19.361 mm | 1.4billion[34] | 4 | 16 | 8MB | ||
| IvyBridge-HM-4 | N0 | 133mm2[31] | 7.656 x 17.349 mm | 4 | 6 | 6MB[33] |
Ivy Bridge-E features[edit]
| CPUID code | 0306Fxh |
|---|---|
| Product code | 80633 |
| L1cache | 32KB per core |
| L2 cache | 256KB per core |
| L3 cache | 15MB shared |
| Predecessor | Sandy Bridge-E |
| Successor | Haswell-E |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 2011 |
| CPUID code | 0306Fxh |
|---|---|
| Product code | 80634 |
| L1cache | 32KB per core |
| L2 cache | 256KB per core |
| L3 cache | 10MB to 25MB shared |
| Predecessor | Sandy Bridge-EN |
| Successor | Haswell-EN |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 1356 |
| CPUID code | 0306Fxh |
|---|---|
| Product code | 80635 |
| L1cache | 32KB per core |
| L2 cache | 256KB per core |
| L3 cache | 10MB to 30MB shared |
| Predecessor | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| Successor | Haswell-EP |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 2011 |
| CPUID code | 0306Fxh |
|---|---|
| Product code | 80636 |
| L1cache | 32KB per core |
| L2 cache | 256KB per core |
| L3 cache | 12MB to 37.5MB shared |
| Predecessor | Westmere-EX |
| Successor | ? |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 2011 |
IvyBridge-E is the follow-up toSandy Bridge-E, using the same CPU core as the Ivy Bridge processor, but in anLGA 2011orLGA 1356package for workstations and servers.
New RAS features for Ivybridge-EX
Dual-Memory Controller for Ivybridge-EP
No integrated GPU
Up to 15 CPU cores
Up to 37.5MB L3 cache.[35]
Thermal design power between 60W and 155W
Support for up to 8 DIMMS of DDR3-1866 memory per socket
Models and Steppings[edit]
The Ivy Bridge-E family is made in three different versions, by number of cores, and for three market segments: the basic Ivy Bridge-E is a single-socket processor sold as Corei7-49xx and is only available in the six-core S1 stepping, with some versions limited to four active cores.
Ivy Bridge-EN (Xeon E5-14xx v2 and Xeon E5-24xx v2) is the model for single- and dual-socket servers using LGA 1356 with up to 10 cores, while Ivy Bridge-EP (nd Xeon E5-16xx v2, Xeon E5-26xx v2 and Xeon E5-46xx v2) scales up to four LGA 2011 sockets and up to 12 cores per chip and Ivybridge-EX will have up to 15 cores and scale to 8 sockets.
| Die Code Name | CPUID | Stepping | Die size | Transistors | Cores | L3 Cache | Socket |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivy Bridge-E-6 | 0x0306Fx | S1 | 256.5mm2 | 1.86 billion | 6 | 15MB | LGA 2011 |
| Ivy Bridge-EN-6 | LGA 1356 | ||||||
| Ivy Bridge-EP-6 | LGA 2011 | ||||||
| Ivy Bridge-EN-10 | M1 | 346.5mm2 | 2.86 billion | 10 | 25MB | LGA 1356 | |
| Ivy Bridge-EP-10 | LGA 2011 | ||||||
| Ivy Bridge-EX-15 | C1 | 541mm2 | 4.3 billion | 15 | 37.5MB | LGA 2011 |
List of Ivy Bridge and Ivy Bridge-E processors[edit]
Processors featuring Intel's HD4000 graphics (or HDP4000 for Xeon) are set inbold. Other processors feature HD2500 graphics unless indicated by N/A.
Desktop processors[edit]
List of announced desktop processors as follows:
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
CPUClock rate | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date |
Release price (USD) |
Motherboard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Socket | Interface | Memory | ||||||||
| Extreme / High-End |
6 (12) | Core i7 Extreme |
4960X | 3.6GHz | 4.0GHz | N/A | 15MB | 130W | 2013-09-10 | $999[36] | LGA 2011 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0* |
Up to quad channel DDR3-1866 |
|
| Core i7 | 4930K | 3.4GHz | 3.9GHz | 12MB | $583[36] | |||||||||
| 4 (8) | 4820K | 3.7GHz | 10MB | $323[36] | ||||||||||
| Performance | 3770K | 3.5GHz | 3.9GHz | 650MHz | 1150MHz | 8MB | 77W | 2012-04-23 | $332 | LGA 1155 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0? |
Up to dual channel DDR3-1600[37] |
||
| 3770 | 3.4GHz | $294 | ||||||||||||
| 3770S | 3.1GHz | 65W | ||||||||||||
| 3770T | 2.5GHz | 3.7GHz | 45W | |||||||||||
| Mainstream | 4 (4) | Core i5 | 3570K | 3.4GHz | 3.8GHz | 6MB | 77W | $225 | ||||||
| 3570 | 2012-05-31[38] | $205 | ||||||||||||
| 3570S | 3.1GHz | 65W | ||||||||||||
| 3570T | 2.3GHz | 3.3GHz | 45W | |||||||||||
| 3550 | 3.3GHz | 3.7GHz | 77W | 2012-04-23 | ||||||||||
| 3550S | 3.0GHz | 65W | ||||||||||||
| 3475S | 2.9GHz | 3.6GHz | 1100MHz | 2012-05-31[38] | $201 | |||||||||
| 3470 | 3.2GHz | 77W | $184 | |||||||||||
| 3470S | 2.9GHz | 65W | ||||||||||||
| 2 (4) | 3470T | 3MB | 35W | |||||||||||
| 4 (4) | 3450 | 3.1GHz | 3.5GHz | 6MB | 77W | 2012-04-23 | ||||||||
| 3450S | 2.8GHz | 65W | ||||||||||||
| 3350P | 3.1GHz | 3.3GHz | N/A | 69W | 2012-09-03 | $177 | ||||||||
| 3340 | 650MHz | 1050MHz | 77W | 2013-09-01 | $182 | |||||||||
| 3340S | 2.8GHz | 65W | ||||||||||||
| 3335S | 2.7GHz | 3.2GHz | 2012-09-03 | $194 | ||||||||||
| 3330S | $177 | |||||||||||||
| 3330 | 3.0GHz | 77W | $182 | |||||||||||
| 2 (4) | Core i3 | 3250 | 3.5GHz | N/A | 3MB | 55W | 2013-06-09 | $138 | DMI 2.0 PCIe 2.0 |
|||||
| 3245 | 3.4GHz | $134 | ||||||||||||
| 3240 | 2012-09-03 | $138 | ||||||||||||
| 3225 | 3.3GHz | $134 | ||||||||||||
| 3220 | $117 | |||||||||||||
| 3210 | 3.2GHz | 2013-01-20 | ||||||||||||
| 3250T | 3.0GHz | 35W | 2013-06-09 | $138 | ||||||||||
| 3240T | 2.9GHz | 2012-09-03 | ||||||||||||
| 3220T | 2.8GHz | $117 | ||||||||||||
| 2 (2) | Pentium | G2140 | 3.3GHz | 55W | 2013-06-09 | $86 | ||||||||
| G2130 | 3.2GHz | 2013-01-20 | ||||||||||||
| G2120 | 3.1GHz | 2012-09-03 | ||||||||||||
| G2120T | 2.7GHz | 35W | 2013-06-09 | $75 | ||||||||||
| G2100T | 2.6GHz | 2012-09-03 | ||||||||||||
| G2030 | 3.0GHz | 55W | 2013-06-09 | $64 | Dual channel DDR3-1333 | |||||||||
| G2020 | 2.9GHz | 2013-01-20 | ||||||||||||
| G2010 | 2.8GHz | |||||||||||||
| G2030T | 2.6GHz | 35W | 2013-06-09 | |||||||||||
| G2020T | 2.5GHz | 2013-01-20 | ||||||||||||
| 2 (2) | Celeron | G1630 | 2.8GHz | 2MB | 55W | 2013-09-01 | $52 | |||||||
| G1620 | 2.7GHz | 2013-01-20 | ||||||||||||
| G1610 | 2.6GHz | $42 | ||||||||||||
| G1620T | 2.4GHz | 35W | 2013-09-01 | |||||||||||
| G1610T | 2.3GHz | 2013-01-20 | ||||||||||||
?Requires a compatible Motherboard
Suffixes to denote:
K - Unlocked(adjustable CPU multiplier up to 63 bins)
S - Performance-optimized lifestyle(low power with 65W TDP)
T - Power-optimized lifestyle(ultra low power with 35-45W TDP)
P - No on-die video chipset
X – Extreme performance(adjustable CPU ratio with no ratio limit)
Server processors[edit]
Additional high-end server processors based on the Ivy Bridge architecture, code named Ivytown, were announced September 10, 2013 at theIntel Developer Forum, after the usual one year interval between consumer and server product releases.[39][40][41]The IvyBridge-EP processor line announced in September 2013 has up to 12 cores and 30MB third level cache, with rumors of Ivy Bridge-EX up to 15 cores and an increased third level cache of up to 37.5MB,[42][43]although an early leaked lineup of Ivy Bridge-E included processors with a maximum of 6 cores.[44]Both Core-i7 and Xeon versions are produced: the Xeon versions marketed asXeon E5-2600 V2act as drop-in replacements for the existing Sandy Bridge-EN and Sandy Bridge-EP based Xeon E5, and Core-i7 versions designated i7-4820K, i7-4930K, i7-4960X were released on September 10, 2013 remained compatible withX79andLGA2011hardware.[43][45]
A new IvyBridge-EX line marketed asXeon E7 V2had no corresponding predecessor using the SandyBridge microarchitecture but instead followed the olderWestmere-EXprocessors.
| Target Segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
CPUClock rate | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date |
Price (USD) |
Motherboard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Socket | Interface | Memory | ||||||||
| 2P Server | 12 (24) | XeonE5 | 2697v2 | 2.7GHz | 3.5GHz | N/A | 30MB | 130W | 2013-09-10 | $2614 | LGA 2011 |
2×QPI DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0 |
Up to quad channel DDR3-1866 |
|
| 2695v2 | 2.4GHz | 3.2GHz | 115W | $2336 | ||||||||||
| 2692v2 | 2.2GHz | 3.0GHz | 2013-06 | OEM (Tianhe-2) | ||||||||||
| 2651v2 | 1.8GHz | ? | ? | 2013-09-10 | ||||||||||
| 10 (20) | 2690v2 | 3.0GHz | 3.6GHz | 25MB | 130W | $2057 | ||||||||
| 2680v2 | 2.8GHz | 3.6GHz | 115W | $1723 | ||||||||||
| 2670v2 | 2.5GHz | 3.3GHz | $1552 | |||||||||||
| 2660v2 | 2.2GHz | 3.0GHz | 95W | $1389 | ||||||||||
| 2658v2 | 2.4GHz | $1440 | ||||||||||||
| 2650Lv2 | 1.7GHz | 2.1GHz | 70W | $1219 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1600 |
|||||||||
| 2648Lv2 | 1.9GHz | 2.5GHz | $1218 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1866 |
||||||||||
| 8 (16) | 2687Wv2 | 3.4GHz | 4.0GHz | 150W | $2108 | |||||||||
| 2667v2 | 3.3GHz | 130W | $2057 | |||||||||||
| 2650v2 | 2.6GHz | 3.4GHz | 20MB | 95W | $1166 | |||||||||
| 2640v2 | 2.0GHz | 2.5GHz | $885 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1600 |
||||||||||
| 2628Lv2 | 1.9GHz | 2.4GHz | 70W | $1000 | ||||||||||
| 6 (12) | 2643v2 | 3.5GHz | 3.8GHz | 25MB | 130W | $1552 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1866 |
|||||||
| 2630v2 | 2.6GHz | 3.1GHz | 15MB | 80W | $612 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1600 |
||||||||
| 2630Lv2 | 2.4GHz | 2.8GHz | 60W | |||||||||||
| 2620v2 | 2.1GHz | 2.6GHz | 80W | $406 | ||||||||||
| 2618Lv2 | 2.0GHz | N/A | 50W | $520 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1333 |
|||||||||
| 4 (8) | 2637v2 | 3.5GHz | 3.8GHz | 130W | $996 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1866 |
||||||||
| 4 (4) | 2609v2 | 2.5GHz | N/A | 10MB | 80W | $294 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1333 |
|||||||
| 2603v2 | 1.8GHz | $202 | ||||||||||||
| 1P Server | 8 (16) | 1680v2 | 3.0GHz | 3.9GHz | 25MB | 130W | $1723 | 0×QPI DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0 |
Up to quad channel DDR3-1866 |
|||||
| 6 (12) | 1660v2 | 3.7GHz | 4.0GHz | 15MB | $1080 | |||||||||
| 1650v2 | 3.5GHz | 3.9GHz | 12MB | $583 | ||||||||||
| 4 (8) | 1620v2 | 3.7GHz | 10MB | $294 | ||||||||||
| 4 (4) | 1607v2 | 3.0GHz | N/A | $244 | Up to quad channel DDR3-1600 |
|||||||||
| 4 (8) | XeonE3 | 1290v2 | 3.7GHz | 4.1GHz | 8MB | 87W | 2012-05-14 | $885 | LGA 1155 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0? |
Up to dual channel DDR3-1600 |
|||
| 1280v2 | 3.6GHz | 4.0GHz | 69W | $623 | ||||||||||
| 1275v2 | 3.5GHz | 3.9GHz | 650MHz | 1.25GHz | 77W | $350 | ||||||||
| 1270v2 | N/A | 69W | $339 | |||||||||||
| 1265Lv2 | 2.5GHz | 3.5GHz | 650MHz | 1.15GHz | 45W | $305 | ||||||||
| 1245v2 | 3.4GHz | 3.8GHz | 650MHz | 1.25GHz | 77W | $273 | ||||||||
| 1240v2 | N/A | 69W | $261 | |||||||||||
| 1230v2 | 3.3GHz | 3.7GHz | $230 | |||||||||||
| 4 (4) | 1225v2 | 3.2GHz | 3.6GHz | 650MHz | 1.25GHz | 77W | $224 | |||||||
| 1220v2 | 3.1GHz | 3.5GHz | N/A | 69W | $203 | |||||||||
| 2 (4) | 1220Lv2 | 2.3GHz | 3MB | 17W | $189 | |||||||||
?Requires a compatible Motherboard
Mobile processors[edit]
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
Programmable TDP | CPU Turbo | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
Release Date |
Price (USD) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDP[46] | cTDP down | Nominal TDP | cTDP up | 1-core | Normal | Turbo | |||||||
| Performance | 4 (8) | Core i7 | 3940XM | N/A | 45W /?GHz | 55W / 3.0GHz | 65W /?GHz | 3.9GHz | 650MHz | 1350MHz | 8MB | 2012-09-30 | $1096 |
| 3920XM | 45W /?GHz | 55W / 2.9GHz | 65W /?GHz | 3.8GHz | 1300MHz | 2012-04-23 | |||||||
| 3840QM | N/A | 45W / 2.8GHz | N/A | 2012-09-30 | $568 | ||||||||
| 3820QM | 45W / 2.7GHz | 3.7GHz | 1250MHz | 2012-04-23 | |||||||||
| 3740QM | 1300MHz | 6MB | 2012-09-30 | $378 | |||||||||
| 3720QM | 45W / 2.6GHz | 3.6GHz | 1250MHz | 2012-04-23 | |||||||||
| 3635QM | 45W / 2.4GHz | 3.4GHz | 1200MHz | 2012-09-30 | N/A | ||||||||
| 3632QM | 35W / 2.2GHz | 3.2GHz | 1150MHz | $378 | |||||||||
| 3630QM | 45W / 2.4GHz | 3.4GHz | |||||||||||
| 3615QM | 45W / 2.3GHz | 3.3GHz | 1200MHz | 2012-04-23 | |||||||||
| 3612QM | 35W / 2.1GHz | 3.1GHz | 1100MHz | ||||||||||
| 3610QM | 45W / 2.3GHz | 3.3GHz | |||||||||||
| Mainstream | 2 (4) | 3689Y | 7W /?GHz | 10W / | 13W / 1.5GHz | 2.6GHz | 350MHz | 850MHz | 4MB | 2013-01-07 | $362 | ||
| 3687U | N/A | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 2.1GHz | 25W / 3.1GHz | 3.3GHz | 1200MHz | 2013-01-20 | $346 | |||||
| 3667U | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 2.0GHz | 25W / 3.0GHz | 3.2GHz | 1150MHz | 2012-06-03 | |||||||
| 3537U | 14W /?GHz | 25W / 2.9GHz | 3.1GHz | 1200MHz | 2013-01-20 | ||||||||
| 3555LE | N/A | 25W / 2.5GHz | N/A | 3.2GHz | 550MHz | 1000MHz | 2012-06-03 | $360 | |||||
| 3540M | 35W / 3.0GHz | 3.7GHz | 650MHz | 1300MHz | 2013-01-20 | $346 | |||||||
| 3525M | 35W / 2.9GHz | 3.6GHz | 1350MHz | Q3 2012 | |||||||||
| 3520M | 1250MHz | 2012-06-03 | $346 | ||||||||||
| 3517U | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.9GHz | 25W / 2.8GHz | 3.0GHz | 350MHz | 1150MHz | |||||||
| 3517UE | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.7GHz | 25W / 2.6GHz | 2.8GHz | 1000MHz | $330 | |||||||
| Core i5 | 3610ME | N/A | 35W / 2.7GHz | N/A | 3.3GHz | 650MHz | 950MHz | 3MB | $276 | ||||
| 3439Y | 7W /?GHz | 10W /?GHz | 13W / 1.5GHz | 2.3GHz | 350MHz | 850MHz | 2013-01-07 | $250 | |||||
| 3437U' | N/A | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.9GHz | 25W / 2.4GHz | 2.9GHz | 650MHz | 1200MHz | 2013-01-20 | $225 | ||||
| 3427U | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.8GHz | 25W / 2.3GHz | 2.8GHz | 350MHz | 1150MHz | 2012-06-03 | ||||||
| 3380M | N/A | 35W / 2.9GHz | N/A | 3.6GHz | 650MHz | 1250MHz | 2013-01-20 | $266 | |||||
| 3365M | 35W / 2.8GHz | 3.5GHz | 1350MHz | Q3 2012 | |||||||||
| 3360M | 1200MHz | 2012-06-03 | $266 | ||||||||||
| 3340M | 35W / 2.7GHz | 3.4GHz | 1250MHz | 2013-01-20 | $225 | ||||||||
| 3339Y | 7W /?GHz | 10W /?GHz | 13W / 1.5GHz | 2.0GHz | 350MHz | 850MHz | 2013-01-07 | $250 | |||||
| 3337U | N/A | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.8GHz | 2.7GHz | 350MHz | 1100MHz | 2013-01-20 | $225 | |||||
| 3320M | N/A | 35W / 2.6GHz | 3.3GHz | 650MHz | 1200MHz | 2012-06-03 | |||||||
| 3317U | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.7GHz | 2.6GHz | 350MHz | 1050MHz | ||||||||
| 3230M | N/A | 35W / 2.6GHz | 3.2GHz | 650MHz | 1100MHz | 2013-01-20 | |||||||
| 3210M | 35W / 2.5GHz | 3.1GHz | 2012-06-03 | ||||||||||
| Core i3 | 3229Y | 7W /?GHz | 10W /?GHz | 13W / 1.4GHz | N/A | 350MHz | 850MHz | 2013-01-07 | $250 | ||||
| 3227U | N/A | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.9GHz | 1100MHz | 2013-01-20 | $225 | |||||||
| 3217U | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.8GHz | 1050MHz | 2012-06-24 | |||||||||
| 3217UE | 14W /?GHz | 17W / 1.6GHz | 900MHz | July 2013 | $261 | ||||||||
| 3130M | N/A | 35W / 2.6GHz | 650MHz | 1100MHz | 2013-01-20 | $225 | |||||||
| 3120M | 35W / 2.5GHz | 2012-09-30 | |||||||||||
| 3120ME | 35W / 2.4GHz | 900MHz | July 2013 | ||||||||||
| 3110M | 1000MHz | 2012-06-24 | |||||||||||
| 2 (2) | Pentium | 2030M | 35W / 2.5GHz | 1100MHz | 2MB | 2013-01-20 | $134 | ||||||
| 2020M | 35W / 2.4GHz | 2012-09-30 | |||||||||||
| 2127U | 17W / 1.9GHz | 350MHz | 2013-06-09 | ||||||||||
| 2117U | 17W / 1.8GHz | 1000MHz | 2012-09-30 | ||||||||||
| 2129Y | 7W | 10W / 1.1GHz | 850MHz | 2013-01-07 | $150 | ||||||||
| Celeron | 1019Y | 7W | 10W / 1.0GHz | 800MHz | 2013-04 | $153 | |||||||
| 1020E | N/A | 35W / 2.2GHz | 650MHz | 1000MHz | 2013-01-20 | $86 | |||||||
| 1020M | 35W / 2.1GHz | ||||||||||||
| 1005M | 35W / 1.9GHz | 2013-06-09 | |||||||||||
| 1000M | 35W / 1.8GHz | 2013-01-20 | |||||||||||
| 1037U | 17W / 1.8GHz | 350MHz | |||||||||||
| 1017U | 17W / 1.6GHz | 2013-06-09 | |||||||||||
| 1007U | 17W / 1.5GHz | 2013-01-20 | |||||||||||
| 1047UE | 17W / 1.4GHz | 900MHz | $134 | ||||||||||
| 1 (1) | 927UE | 17W / 1.5GHz | $107 | ||||||||||
M - Mobile processor
Q - Quad-core
U - Ultra-low power
X - 'Extreme'
Y - Extreme-ultra low power
Roadmap[edit]
Intel demonstrated theHaswellarchitecture in September 2011, which began release in 2013 as the successor toSandy Bridgeand Ivy Bridge.[47]
|
|||
See also[edit]
List of Intel CPU microarchitectures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haswell_(microarchitecture)
Haswell (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| L1cache | 64KBper core |
|---|---|
| L2 cache | 256KB per core |
| L3 cache | 2MBto 8MB shared |
| GPU | HD Graphics4200, 4400, 4600, 5000, Iris 5100 or Iris Pro 5200 200 MHz to 1.3 GHz |
| Predecessor | Sandy Bridge (tock) Ivy Bridge (tick) |
| Successor | Broadwell (tick) Skylake (tock) |
| Socket(s) |
LGA 1150 |
Haswellis thecodenamefor aprocessormicroarchitecturedeveloped byIntelas the successor to theIvy Bridgearchitecture.[1]It uses the22 nmprocess.[2]Intel officially announced CPUs with this microarchitecture on June 4, 2013 atComputex Taipei2013.[3]With Haswell, Intel introduced a low-power processor designed for convertible or 'hybrid'Ultrabooks, having the Y suffix. Intel demonstrated a working Haswell chip at the 2011Intel Developer Forum.[4]
Haswell CPUs are used in conjunction with theIntel 8 Series chipsets.
Contents
[hide]
1Design
1.1Notes
1.2Performance
2Technology
2.1Features carried over from Ivy Bridge
2.2New features
2.3Expected Server features
3List of Haswell processors
3.1Desktop processors
3.2Server processors
3.3Mobile processors
4Roadmap
5See also
6References
7External links
Design[edit]
A Haswellwaferwith a pin for scale.
The Haswell architecture is specifically designed[5]to optimize the power savings and performance benefits from the move toFinFET(non-planar, "3D") transistors on the improved 22nm process node.[6]
Haswell has been launched in three major forms:[7]
Desktop version (LGA1150 socket):Haswell-DT
Mobile/Laptop version (PGAsocket):Haswell-MB
BGAversion:
47W and 57W TDP classes:Haswell-H(For "All-in-one" systems, Mini-ITX form factor motherboards, and other small footprint formats.)
13.5W and 15W TDP classes (MCP):Haswell-ULT(For Intel's UltraBook platform.)
10W TDP class (SoC):Haswell-ULX(For tablets and certain UltraBook-class implementations.)
Notes[edit]
ULT =Ultra LowTDP; ULX =Ultra Low eXtremeTDP.
Only certain quad-core variants and BGA R-seriesSKUswill receive GT3 (Intel HD 5000, Intel Iris 5100), or GT3e (Intel Iris Pro 5200) integrated graphics. All other models will get GT2 (Intel HD 4X00) integrated graphics.[8]See alsoIntel HD Graphicsfor more detailed specifications.
Due to low power requirements of tablet and UltraBook platforms, Haswell-ULT and Haswell-ULX will only be available in dual-core. All other versions will be available in dual- or quad-core variants.
Performance[edit]
Compared toIvy Bridge:
Approximately 8% bettervector processingperformance.[9]
Up to 6% faster single-threaded performance.
6% faster multi-threaded performance.
Desktop variants of Haswell draw between 8% and 23% more power under load than Ivy Bridge.[9][10][11]
A 6% increase in sequential CPUperformance(eight execution ports per core versus six).[9]
Up to 20% performance increase over the integrated HD4000GPU(Haswell HD4600 vs Ivy Bridge's built-inIntel HD4000).[9]
Total performance improvement on average is about 3%.[9]
Around 15°C hotter than Ivy Bridge and unable to break 4.2GHz easily.[12][13][14][15][16][17]
Technology[edit]
See also:Intel HD Graphics
Features carried over from Ivy Bridge[edit]
A22nmmanufacturing process.
3Dtri-gate transistors.
Micro-operation cachecapable of storing 1.5Kmicro-operations(approximately 6KB in size).[18]
A 14- to 19-stageinstruction pipeline, depending on the micro-operation cache hit or miss (has been working that way since the introduction ofSandy BridgeCPUs).[18]
Mainstream variants are up to quad-core.[19]
Native support fordual-channelDDR3memory,[20]with up to 32GB ofRAMon LGA 1150 variants.
64KB (32KB Instruction + 32KB Data) L1 cache and 256KB L2 cache per core.[21]
A total of 16PCI Express3.0 lanes.
New features[edit]
Wider Core: fourth ALU, third AGU, secondbranch predictionunit, deeper buffers, higher cache bandwidth, improved front-end andmemory controller
Haswell New Instructions[22](HNI, includesAdvanced Vector Extensions 2(AVX2),gather,BMI1+BMI2, LZCNT andFMA3support).[23]
The instruction decode queue, which holds instructions after they have been decoded, is no longer statically partitioned between the two threads that each core can service.[18]
New sockets –LGA 1150for desktops and rPGA947 & BGA1364 for the mobile market.[24]
Z97 (performance) and H97 (mainstream)chipsetsfor the Haswell Refresh andBroadwell, in Q2 2014.[25]
New socket –LGA 2011-3with X99 chipset for the Enthusiast-Class Desktop Platform Haswell-E.[26]
IntelTransactional Synchronization Extensions(TSX), on selected models.[27]
Graphics support in hardware forDirect3D 11.1andOpenGL4.0.[28]
DDR4for the enterprise/server variant (Haswell-EX).[29]
DDR4for the Enthusiast-Class Desktop Platform Haswell-E.[30]
Variable Base clock (BClk)[31]likeLGA 2011.[32]
There are four versions of the integrated GPU: GT1, GT2, GT3 and GT3e, where GT3 version has 40 execution units (EUs). Haswell's predecessor, Ivy Bridge, has a maximum of 16 EUs. GT3e version with 40 EUs and on-package 128MB of embedded DRAM (eDRAM), calledCrystal Well, is available only in mobile H-SKUsand desktop (BGA-only) R-SKUs. Effectively, this eDRAM is a Level 4 cache — shared dynamically between the on-die GPU and CPU, and serving as avictim cacheto the CPU's L3 cache.[33][34][35][36][37]
Support forThunderbolttechnology and Thunderbolt 2.0.[38]
Fully integratedvoltage regulator(FIVR), thereby moving some of the components frommotherboardonto the CPU.[39][40][41]FIVR is implemented as a separate 13x8 mm on-package die, manufactured in90 nmprocess.[42]
New advanced power-saving system.
37, 47, 57Wthermal design power(TDP) mobile processors.[19]
35, 45, 65, 84, 95 and 130–140W (high-end, Haswell-E) TDP desktop processors.[19]
15W TDP processors for theUltrabookplatform (multi-chip package likeWestmere)[43]leading to reduced heat which results in thinner as well as lighter Ultrabooks, but performance level will be lower than the 17W version.[44]
Shrink of thePlatform Controller Hub(PCH), from65 nmto32 nm.[45]
| Cache | Page Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Level | 4KB | 2MB | 1GB |
| DTLB | 1st | 64 | 32 | 4 |
| ITLB | 1st | 128 | 8 / logical core | none |
| STLB | 2nd | 1024 | none | |
Expected Server features[edit]
Release not before end of 2014.
Haswell-EP having up to 14–15 cores, and Haswell-EX with up to 18–20 cores.
A newcachedesign.
Up to 35MB total unified cache (Last Level Cache (LLC)) for Haswell-EP[48][49]and up to 40MB for Haswell-EX.
It is possible thatSocket R3will replaceLGA 2011for server Haswells.[50][51]
List of Haswell processors[edit]
Desktop processors[edit]
All models support:MMX,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,F16C, BMI1 (Bit Manipulation Instructions1)+BMI2, Enhanced IntelSpeedStepTechnology (EIST),Intel 64, XD bit (anNX bitimplementation),Intel VT-x,andSmart Cache.
Core i3, i5, i7 supportAVXandAES-NI.[52]
Core i5 and i7 supportAVX2,FMA3andTurbo Boost2.0.[52]
Core i3 and i7 supportHyper-threading(HT).The dual-core Core i5 4570T also supportsHT.[52]
Parts below 45xx as well as R and K parts do not supportTSX,Trusted Execution Technology,orvPro.[52]
Intel VT-dis supported on i5 and i7 except K models.[52]
Transistors: 1.4 billion
Diesize: 177mm2
Intel HD Graphicsin following variants:
R-series desktop processors feature Intel Iris Pro 5200 graphics (GT3e).[53]
All other currently known i3, i5 and i7 desktop processors include Intel HD 4600 graphics (GT2).[54]
The exceptions are processors 4130 and 4130T, which include HD 4400 graphics (GT2).
Pentium processors contain Intel HD Graphics (GT1).
Haswell-based desktop Celerons are planned for the first quarter of 2014.[55]
List of announced desktop processors is as follows:
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
CPUClock rate | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
GPU eDRAM |
TDP | Release Date |
Release price (USD) |
Motherboard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Socket | Interface | Memory | |||||||||
| Performance | 4 (8) | Corei7 | 4771 | 3.5GHz | 3.9GHz | 350MHz[56] | 1.2GHz | 8MB | N/A | 84W | September1,2013 | $320 | LGA 1150 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0? |
Up to dual channel DDR3-1600[57] |
| 4770K | 1.25GHz | June2,2013[58] | $339 | ||||||||||||
| 4770 | 3.4GHz | 1.2GHz | $303 | ||||||||||||
| 4770S | 3.1GHz | 65W | |||||||||||||
| 4770R | 3.2GHz | 200MHz | 1.3GHz | 6MB | 128MB | $ | BGA | ||||||||
| 4770T | 2.5GHz | 3.7GHz | 350MHz[56] | 1.2GHz | 8MB | N/A | 45W | $303 | LGA 1150 |
||||||
| 4765T | 2.0GHz | 3.0GHz | 35W | ||||||||||||
| Mainstream | 4 (4) | Core i5 | 4670K | 3.4GHz | 3.8GHz | 6MB | 84W | $242 | |||||||
| 4670 | $213 | ||||||||||||||
| 4670S | 3.1GHz | 65W | |||||||||||||
| 4670R | 3.0GHz | 3.7GHz | 200MHz | 1.3GHz | 4MB | 128MB | $ | BGA | |||||||
| 4670T | 2.3GHz | 3.3GHz | 350MHz[56] | 1.2GHz | 6MB | N/A | 45W | $213 | LGA 1150 |
||||||
| 4570 | 3.2GHz | 3.6GHz | 1.15GHz | 84W | $192 | ||||||||||
| 4570S | 2.9GHz | 65W | |||||||||||||
| 4570R | 2.7GHz | 3.2GHz | 200MHz | 4MB | 128MB | $ | BGA | ||||||||
| 2 (4) | 4570T | 2.9GHz | 3.6GHz | N/A | 35W | $192 | LGA 1150 |
||||||||
| 4 (4) | 4440 | 3.1GHz | 3.3GHz | 350MHz[56] | 1.1GHz | 6MB | 84W | September1,2013 | $187 | ||||||
| 4440S | 2.8GHz | 65W | |||||||||||||
| 4430 | 3.0GHz | 3.2GHz | 84W | June2,2013[58] | $182 | ||||||||||
| 4430S | 2.7GHz | 65W | |||||||||||||
| 2 (4) | Corei3 | 4340 | 3.6GHz | N/A | 1.15GHz | 4MB | 54W | September1,2013 | $157 | ||||||
| 4330 | 3.5GHz | $147 | |||||||||||||
| 4330T | 3.0GHz | 200MHz | 35W | $138 | |||||||||||
| 4330TE | 2.4GHz | 350MHz | 1GHz | $122 | |||||||||||
| 4130 | 3.4GHz | 1.15GHz | 3MB | 54W | $129 | ||||||||||
| 4130T | 2.9GHz | 200MHz | 35W | $131 | |||||||||||
| 2 (2) | Pentium | G3430 | 3.3GHz | 350MHz | 1.1GHz | 54W | $93 | ||||||||
| G3420 | 3.2GHz | 1.15GHz | $82 | ||||||||||||
| G3420T | 2.7GHz | 200MHz | 1.1GHz | 35W | $ | ||||||||||
| G3320TE | 2.3GHz | 350MHz | 1GHz | $70 | |||||||||||
| G3220 | 3.0GHz | 1.1GHz | 54W | $64 | Up to dual channel DDR3-1333 |
||||||||||
| G3220T | 2.6GHz | 200MHz | 35W | $64 | |||||||||||
?Requires a compatible motherboard
Suffixes to denote:
K - Unlocked(adjustable CPU multiplier up to 63x)
S - Performance-optimized lifestyle(low power with 65W TDP)
T - Power-optimized lifestyle(ultra low power with 35–45 W TDP)
R - BGA packaging / High performance GPU(currently Iris Pro 5200 (GT3e))
Server processors[edit]
All models support:MMX,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,AVX(Advanced Vector Extensions),AVX2,FMA3,F16C, BMI (Bit Manipulation Instructions 1)+BMI2, Enhanced IntelSpeedStepTechnology (EIST),Intel 64, XD bit (anNX bitimplementation),TXT,Intel vPro,Intel VT-x,Intel VT-d,Hyper-threading(except E3-1220 v3 and E3-1225 v3),Turbo Boost2.0,AES-NI, Smart Cache,andTSX.
List of announced server processors as follows:
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
GPUModel | CPUClock rate | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date |
Release price (USD) tray / box |
Motherboard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Socket | Interface | Memory | |||||||||
| Server | 4(8) | XeonE3 | 1285v3 | HD P4600 (GT2) | 3.6GHz | 4.0GHz | 350MHz | 1.3GHz | 8MB | 84W | June2,2013 | $662 / — | LGA 1150 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0? |
up to dual channel DDR3-1600 w/ ECC |
| 1285Lv3 | 3.1GHz | 3.9GHz | 1.25GHz | 65W | $774 / — | ||||||||||
| 1280v3 | N/A | 3.6GHz | 4.0GHz | N/A | 82W | $612 / — | |||||||||
| 1275v3 | HD P4600 (GT2) | 3.5GHz | 3.9GHz | 350MHz | 1.25GHz | 84W | $339 / $350 | ||||||||
| 1270v3 | N/A | N/A | 80W | $328 / — | |||||||||||
| 1268Lv3 | HD P4600 (GT2) | 2.3GHz | 3.3GHz | 350MHz | 1GHz | 45W | $310 / — | ||||||||
| 1265Lv3 | HD (GT1) | 2.5GHz | 3.7GHz | 1.2GHz | $294 / — | ||||||||||
| 1245v3 | HD P4600 (GT2) | 3.4GHz | 3.8GHz | 84W | $276 / $287 | ||||||||||
| 1240v3 | N/A | N/A | 80W | $262 / $273 | |||||||||||
| 1230v3 | 3.3GHz | 3.7GHz | $240 / $250 | ||||||||||||
| 1230Lv3 | 1.8GHz | 2.8GHz | 25W | $250 / — | |||||||||||
| 4(4) | 1225v3 | HD P4600 (GT2) | 3.2GHz | 3.6GHz | 350MHz | 1.2GHz | 84W | $213 / $224 | |||||||
| 1220v3 | N/A | 3.1GHz | 3.5GHz | N/A | 80W | $193 / — | |||||||||
| 2(4) | 1220Lv3 | 1.1GHz | 1.3GHz | 4MB | 13W | September1,2013 | |||||||||
?Requires a compatible motherboard
Suffixes to denote:
L - Low power
Mobile processors[edit]
All models support:MMX,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,AVX,AVX2,FMA3, F16C, BMI1 (Bit Manipulation Instructions1), BMI2, Enhanced IntelSpeedStepTechnology (EIST),Intel VT-x,Intel 64, XD bit (anNX bitimplementation),Turbo Boost2.0,AES-NI,andSmart Cache.
Platform Controller Hub (PCH) integrated into the CPU package, slightly reducing the amount of space used on motherboards.[59]
List of announced mobile processors as follows:
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
GPUModel | Programmable TDP[60] | CPU Turbo | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
GPU eDRAM |
Release Date |
Price (USD) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDP[61] | cTDP down | Nominal TDP | cTDP up | 1-core | Normal | Turbo | |||||||||
| Performance | 4 (8) | Corei7 | 4930MX | HD4600(GT2) | N/A | N/A | 57W/3.0GHz | 65W/3.7GHz | 3.9GHz | 400MHz | 1350MHz | 8MB | N/A | June2,2013[62] | $1096 |
| 4960HQ | Iris Pro5200(GT3e) | N/A | 47W/2.6GHz | 55W/3.6GHz | 3.8GHz | 200MHz | 1300MHz | 6MB | 128MB[34] | September1,2013[63] | $657 | ||||
| 4950HQ | 47W/2.4GHz | 55W/3.4GHz | 3.6GHz | June2,2013[62] | |||||||||||
| 4900MQ | HD4600(GT2) | 47W/2.8GHz | 55W/3.6GHz | 3.8GHz | 400MHz | 8MB | N/A | $570 | |||||||
| 4860EQ | Iris Pro5200(GT3e) | 47W/1.8GHz | N/A | 3.2GHz | 750MHz | 1000MHz | 6MB | 128MB | August 2012 | $508 | |||||
| 4850EQ | 47W/1.6GHz | 650MHz | $466 | ||||||||||||
| 4850HQ | 47W/2.3GHz | 55W/3.3GHz | 3.5GHz | 200MHz | 1300MHz | June2,2013[62] | $468 | ||||||||
| 4800MQ | HD4600(GT2) | 47W/2.7GHz | 55W/3.5GHz | 3.7GHz | 400MHz | N/A | $380 | ||||||||
| 4750HQ | Iris Pro5200(GT3e) | 47W/2.0GHz | 55W/3.0GHz | 3.2GHz | 200MHz | 1200MHz | 128MB | $440 | |||||||
| 4702MQ | HD4600(GT2) | 37W/2.2GHz | 45W/2.9GHz | 400MHz | 1150MHz | N/A | $383 | ||||||||
| 4702HQ | |||||||||||||||
| 4700MQ | 47W/2.4GHz | 55W/3.2GHz | 3.4GHz | ||||||||||||
| 4700HQ | 1200MHz | ||||||||||||||
| 4700EQ | 1000MHz | $378 | |||||||||||||
| Mainstream | 2 (4) | 4650U | HD5000(GT3) | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/1.7GHz | N/A | 3.3GHz | 200MHz | 1100MHz | 4MB | $454 | ||||
| 4610Y | HD4200(GT2) | 6W/800MHz | 9.5W/800MHz | 11.5W/1.7GHz | 2.9GHz | 850MHz | September1,2013 | N/A | |||||||
| 4600M | HD4600(GT2) | N/A | N/A | 37W/2.9GHz | 3.6GHz | 400MHz | 1300MHz | $346 | |||||||
| 4600U | HD4400(GT2) | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/2.1GHz | 3.3GHz | 200MHz | 1100MHz | $398 | ||||||||
| 4558U | Iris5100(GT3) | 23W/800MHz | 28W/2.8GHz | 1200MHz | June2,2013[62] | $454 | |||||||||
| 4550U | HD5000(GT3) | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/1.5GHz | 3.0GHz | 1100MHz | ||||||||||
| 4500U | HD4400(GT2) | 15W/1.8GHz | 25W/? | $398 | |||||||||||
| Corei5 | 4402E | HD4600(GT2) | N/A | 25W/1.6GHz | N/A | 2.7GHz | 400MHz | 900MHz | 3MB | September1,2013 | $266 | ||||
| 4400E | N/A | 37W/2.7GHz | 3.3GHz | 1000MHz | |||||||||||
| 4350U | HD5000(GT3) | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/1.4GHz | 2.9GHz | 200MHz | 1100MHz | June2,2013[62] | $342 | |||||||
| 4330M | HD4600(GT2) | N/A | 37W/2.8GHz | 3.5GHz | 400MHz | 1250MHz | September1,2013 | $266 | |||||||
| 4302Y | HD4200(GT2) | 4.5W/800MHz | N/A | 11.5W/1.6GHz | 2.3GHz | 200MHz | 850MHz | N/A | |||||||
| 4300Y | 6W/800MHz | 9.5W/800MHz | $304 | ||||||||||||
| 4300M | HD4600(GT2) | N/A | N/A | 37W/2.6GHz | 3.3GHz | 400MHz | 1250MHz | $225 | |||||||
| 4300U | HD4400(GT2) | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/1.9GHz | 2.9GHz | 200MHz | 1100MHz | $287 | ||||||||
| 4288U | Iris5100(GT3) | 23W/800MHz | 28W/2.6GHz | 3.1GHz | 1200MHz | June2,2013[62] | $342 | ||||||||
| 4258U | 28W/2.4GHz | 2.9GHz | 1100MHz | ||||||||||||
| 4250U | HD5000(GT3) | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/1.3GHz | 2.6GHz | 1000MHz | ||||||||||
| 4210Y | HD4200(GT2) | 6W/800MHz | 9.5W/800MHz | 11.5W/1.5GHz | 1.9GHz | 850MHz | September1,2013 | $304 | |||||||
| 4202Y | 4.5W/800MHz | N/A | 11.5W/1.6GHz | 2.0GHz | N/A | ||||||||||
| 4200Y | 6W/800MHz | 9.5W/800MHz | 11.5W/1.4GHz | 1.9GHz | June2,2013[62] | $304 | |||||||||
| 4200U | HD4400(GT2) | N/A | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/1.6GHz | 25W/? | 2.6GHz | 1000MHz | $287 | |||||||
| 4200H | HD4600(GT2) | N/A | 47W/2.8GHz | N/A | 3.4GHz | 400MHz | 1150MHz | September1,2013 | $257 | ||||||
| 4200M | N/A | 37W/2.5GHz | 3.1GHz | $240 | |||||||||||
| Corei3 | 4158U | Iris5100(GT3) | 23W/800MHz | 28W/2.0GHz | N/A | 200MHz | 1100MHz | June2,2013[62] | $342 | ||||||
| 4102E | HD4600(GT2) | N/A | 25W/1.6GHz | 400MHz | 900MHz | September1,2013 | $225 | ||||||||
| 4100E | N/A | 37W/2.4GHz | |||||||||||||
| 4100M | N/A | 37W/2.5GHz | 1100MHz | N/A | |||||||||||
| 4100U | HD4400(GT2) | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/1.8GHz | 200MHz | 1000MHz | June2,2013[62] | $287 | ||||||||
| 4020Y | HD4200(GT2) | 6W/800MHz | 9.5W/800MHz | 11.5W/1.5GHz | 850MHz | September1,2013 | $304 | ||||||||
| 4012Y | 4.5W/800MHz | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| 4010Y | 6W/800MHz | 9.5W/800MHz | 11.5W/1.3GHz | June2,2013[62] | $304 | ||||||||||
| 4010U | HD4400(GT2) | N/A | 11.5W/800MHz | 15W/1.7GHz | 1000MHz | $287 | |||||||||
| 4005U | 950MHz | September1,2013 | $281 | ||||||||||||
| 4000M | HD4600(GT2) | N/A | 37W/2.4GHz | 400MHz | 1100MHz | $240 | |||||||||
| 2 (2) | Pentium | 3560Y | HDGraphics | 6W/800MHz | N/A | 11.5W/1.2GHz | 200MHz | 850MHz | 2MB | N/A | |||||
| 3556U | N/A | 15W/1.7GHz | 1000MHz | ||||||||||||
| 3550M | 37W/2.3GHz | 400MHz | 1100MHz | ||||||||||||
| Celeron | 2980U | 15W/1.6GHz | 200MHz | 1000MHz | $137 | ||||||||||
| 2955U | 15W/1.4GHz | $132 | |||||||||||||
| 2950M | 37W/2.0GHz | 400MHz | 1100MHz | $86 | |||||||||||
Suffixes to denote:
M - Mobile processor
Q - Quad-core
U - Ultra-low power
X - 'Extreme'
Y - Extreme-low power
H - BGA1364 packaging
Roadmap[edit]
The main article for thiscategoryisIntel Tick-Tock.
TheSkylake microarchitecturewill be the successor to the Haswell andBroadwellarchitectures.
|
|||
See also[edit]
List of Intel CPU microarchitectures
Lynx Point(PCH most closely associated with Haswell processors)
LGA 1150: Original Haswell chipsets
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadwell_(microarchitecture)
Broadwell (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Predecessor | Haswell |
|---|---|
| Successor | Skylake |
BroadwellisIntel's codenamefor the second processor in itsHaswell microarchitecture. In keeping with Intel'stick-tockprinciple, Broadwell is the next step in semiconductor fabrication, with feature size reduced to14 nanometers.[1][2]
Broadwell will adopt theMulti-Chip Package (MCP)design. The new layout might be also moving the integrated voltage regulator (IVR) off-die and back onto the motherboards, in an attempt to reduce CPU's heat production.[3]
Broadwell will be used in conjunction with Intel 9 Series chipsets.[4]
Contents
[hide]
1Expected variants
2Instruction set extensions
3Roadmap
4See also
5References
Expected variants[edit]
Broadwell is expected to launch in three major forms:[5]
Broadwell-D: desktop version (LGA 1150socket)
BGAversion:
Broadwell-H: 35Wand 55WTDPclasses, for "all-in-one" systems,Mini-ITXform factor motherboards, and other small footprint formats
Broadwell-U: less than 15W TDP class (SoC), for Intel'sultrabookandNUCplatforms
Broadwell-Y: less than 10W TDP class (SoC), for tablets and certain ultrabook-class implementations
Broadwell-M: mobile/laptop version (PGAsocket).
Instruction set extensions[edit]
Broadwell will introduce someinstruction set architectureextensions:[6][7]
ADOX/ADCX/MULX for improving performance ofarbitrary-precisionintegeroperations[8]
RDSEED to generate 16-, 32- or 64-bitrandom numbersaccording to NIST SP 800-90B and 800-90C[9]
PREFETCHW instruction[9]
Roadmap[edit]
Main article:Intel Tick-Tock
On September 10, 2013, Intel showcased the Broadwell 14nm processor in a demonstration at IDF. Intel CEOBrian Krzanichclaimed that the chip would allow systems to provide a 30 percent improvement in power use over theHaswellchips released in mid-2013.[10]
On October 21, 2013, a leaked Intel roadmap indicated a late 2014 or early 2015 release of the K-series Broadwell on the LGA 1150 platform, in parallel with the previously announced Haswell refresh. This will coincide with the release of Intel's 9-series chipset, which may be required for Broadwell processors due to a change in power specifications for its LGA 1150 socket.[11][12]
No new mobile roadmaps have yet leaked to clarify if mobile Broadwell will be available in 2014. A leaked slide shows Broadwell-E/EP/EX in 2015.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylake_(microarchitecture)
Skylake (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Predecessor | Haswell (tock) Broadwell (tick) |
|---|---|
| Successor | Cannonlake (tick) |
Skylakeis thecodenamefor aprocessormicroarchitectureto be developed byIntelas the successor to theHaswellarchitecture.[1]Skylake will use a14 nmprocess.[2]
There are no official details regarding this microarchitecture's development. The first Skylake processors are expected in 2015-2016.[3]
Contents
[hide]
1Architecture
2Roadmap
3See also
4References
Architecture[edit]
14 nmprocess.
Mainstream support forDDR4 SDRAM.[4][5]
Support for 20 lanesPCIe3 (LGA1151)
Support forPCIe 4.0(Skylake-E/EP/EX).[6][7]
128 KB L1 Cache (64 KB 16 way set associative instruction cache + 64 KB 16 way set associative data cache) (2 cycles)
512 KB L2 cache, 16 way set associative. (6 cycles)
12 MB L3 cache, 24 way set associative (12 cycles)
Quad core default
Support forSATA Express[6]
AVX-512F:Advanced Vector Extensions 3.2.
Intel SHA Extensions:SHA-1andSHA-256(Secure Hash Algorithms).
Intel MPX(Memory Protection Extensions).
Intel ADX(Multi-Precision Add-Carry Instruction Extensions).
LGA1151
Support for up to 64GBDDR4RAM(LGA 1151)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannonlake
Cannonlake
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Predecessor | Skylake |
|---|
In keeping with Intel'stick-tockprinciple, the10 nmshrink ofSkylakeis due out the year after the introduction of the microarchitecture and is rumored to be codenamed "Cannonlake" (sources from 2011 indicated Skymont was to be the codename); however no official announcement has been made. However, Cannonlake is referred to as being in development already, directly from Intel's job listing.[1]Further nodes are not clear either although latest Intel development (Q3 2012) indicates 7nm node may reach production around 2017, with 5nm in 2019.[2]
In 2009 Intel CEOPaul S. Otellinihas been quoted as saying thatsiliconis in its last decade as the base material of the CPU.[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnell_(microarchitecture)
Bonnell (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Intel Atom logo |
|
| Produced | 2008–present |
|---|---|
| Common manufacturer(s) |
Intel |
| Max.CPUclock rate | 600MHz to 2.13GHz |
| FSBspeeds | 400MHz to 667MHz |
| Instruction set | Intel Atomx86 |
| Cores | 1, 2 |
| Successor | Silvermont |
| Package(s) |
441-ballμFCBGA |
| Core name(s) |
Silverthorne |
| List of Intel CPU microarchitectures | |
|---|---|
| Microarchitecture | Pipeline stages |
| P5(Pentium) | 5 |
| P6(Pentium Pro) | 14 |
| P6 (Pentium 3) | 10 |
| NetBurst(Willamette) | 20 |
| NetBurst (Northwood) | 20 |
| NetBurst (Prescott) | 31 |
| NetBurst (Cedar Mill) | 31 |
| Core | 14 |
| Bonnell | 16 |
Bonnellis aCPU microarchitectureused byIntel Atomprocessors which can execute up to two instructions per cycle.[1][2]Like many other x86 microprocessors, it translates x86 instructions (CISCinstructions) into simpler internal operations (sometimes referred to asmicro-ops, effectivelyRISCstyle instructions) prior to execution. The majority of instructions produce one micro-op when translated, with around 4% of instructions used in typical programs producing multiple micro-ops. The number of instructions that produce more than one micro-op is significantly fewer than theP6andNetBurstmicroarchitectures. In the Bonnell microarchitecture, internal micro-ops can contain both a memory load and a memory store in connection with anALUoperation, thus being more similar to the x86 level and more powerful than the micro-ops used in previous designs.[3]This enables relatively good performance with only two integer ALUs, and without anyinstruction reordering,speculative executionorregister renaming. The Bonnell microarchitecture therefore represents a partial revival of the principles used in earlier Intel designs such asP5and thei486, with the sole purpose of enhancing theperformance per wattratio. However,Hyper-Threadingis implemented in an easy (i.e. low-power) way to employ the wholepipelineefficiently by avoiding the typical single thread dependencies.[3]
Contents
[hide]
1First generation cores
1.1Silverthorne microprocessor
1.2Diamondville microprocessor
1.3First generation power requirements
2Second generation cores
2.1Pineview microprocessor
2.2Tunnel Creek microprocessor
2.3Lincroft microprocessor
2.4Stellarton microprocessor
2.5Sodaville SoC
2.6Groveland SoC
3Third generation cores
3.1Cedarview microprocessor
3.2Penwell SoC
3.3Berryville SoC
3.4Cloverview SoC
3.5Centerton SoC
3.6Briarwood SoC
4Roadmap
5See also
6References
6.1Notes
7External links
First generation cores[edit]
Silverthorne microprocessor[edit]
On 2 March 2008, Intel announced a new single-core Atom Z5xx series processor (code-named Silverthorne), to be used inultra-mobile PCsandmobile Internet devices(MIDs), which will supersedeStealey(A100 and A110). The processor has 47 million transistors on a 25mm2die, allowing for extremely economical production (~2500 chips on a single 300mm diameter wafer).
An Atom Z500 processor's dual-thread performance is equivalent to its predecessor Stealey, but should outperform it on applications that can use simultaneousmultithreadingandSSE3.[4]They run from 0.8 to 2.0GHz and have aTDPrating between 0.65 and 2.4W that can dip down to 0.01W when idle.[5]They feature 32KB instruction L1 and 24KB data L1 caches, 512KB L2 cache and a 533MT/s front-side bus. The processors are manufactured in 45nm process.[6][7]
Diamondville microprocessor[edit]
The Intel Atom N270
On 2 March 2008, Intel announced lower-power variants of the Diamondville CPU named Atom N2xx. It was intended for use in nettops and theClassmate PC.[8][9][10]Like their predecessors, these are single-core CPUs with Hyper-Threading.
The N270 has a TDP rating of 2.5W, runs at 1.6GHz and has a 533MHz FSB.[11]The N280 has a clock speed of 1.66GHz and a 667MHz FSB.[12]
On 22 September 2008, Intel announced a new 64-bit dual-core processor (unofficially code-named Dual Diamondville) branded Atom 330, to be used in desktop computers. It runs at 1.6GHz and has a FSB speed of 533MHz and a TDP rating of 8W. Its dual core consists of two Diamondville dies on a single substrate.[13]
During 2009,Nvidiaused the Atom 300 and their GeForce 9400M chipset on amini-ITXform factor motherboard for theirIonplatform.
First generation power requirements[edit]
The relatively low power Atom CPU was originally used with a cheaper, not so electricity-efficient chipset such as the Intel 945G
Although the Atom processor itself is relatively low-power for an x86 microprocessor, many chipsets commonly used with it dissipate significantly more power. For example, while the Atom N270 commonly used in netbooks through mid-2010 has a TDP rating of 2.5W, an Intel Atom platform that uses the 945GSE Express chipset has a specified maximum TDP of 11.8W, with the processor responsible for a relatively small portion of the total power dissipated. Individual figures are 2.5W for the N270 processor, 6W for the 945GSE chipset and 3.3W for the 82801GBM I/O controller.[14][11][15][16]Intel also provides a US15WSystem Controller Hub-based chipset with a combined TDP of less than 5W together with the Atom Z5xx (Silverthorne) series processors, to be used in ultra-mobile PCs and MIDs,[17]though some manufacturers have released ultra-thin systems running these processors (e.g. Sony VAIO X).
Initially, all Atom motherboards on the consumer market featured the Intel 945GC chipset, which uses 22 watts by itself. As of early 2009, only a few manufacturers are offering lower-power motherboards with a 945GSE or US15W chipset and an Atom N270, N280 or Z5xx series CPU.
Second generation cores[edit]
Pineview microprocessor[edit]
New Intel Atom N450 SLBMG 1.66GHz 512kB L2 BGA559
On 21 December 2009, Intel announced the N450, D510 and D410 CPUs with integrated graphics.[18]The new manufacturing process resulted in a 20% reduction in power consumption and a 60% smaller die size.[19][20]The IntelGMA 3150, a 45nm shrink of the GMA 3100 with no HD capabilities, is included as the on-die GPU. Netbooks using this new processor were released on 11 January 2010.[19][21]The major new feature is longer battery life (10 or more hours for 6-cell systems).[22][23]
This generation of the Atom was codenamed Pineview, which is used in the Pine Trail platform. Intel's Pine Trail-M platform utilizes an Atom processor (codenamed Pineview-M) andPlatform Controller Hub(codenamed Tiger Point). The graphics and memory controller have moved into the processor, which is paired with the Tiger Point PCH. This creates a more power-efficient 2-chip platform rather than the 3-chip one used with previous-generation Atom chipsets.[24]
On 1 March 2010 Intel introduced the N470 processor,[25]running at 1.83GHz with a 667MHz FSB and a TDP rating of 6.5W.[26]
The new Atom N4xx chips became available on 11 January 2010.[27]It is used innetbookandnettopsystems and includes an integrated single-channelDDR2memory controller and an integratedgraphics core. It also featuresHyper-Threadingand is manufactured on a 45nm process.[28]The new design uses half the power of the older Menlow platform. This reduced overall power consumption and size makes the platform more desirable for use in smartphones and other mobile internet devices.
The D4xx and D5xx series support thex86-64bit instruction set and DDR2-800 memory. They are rated for embedded use. The series has an integrated graphics processor built directly into the CPU to help improve performance. The models are targeted at nettops and low-end desktops. They do not support SpeedStep.
The Atom D510 dual-core processor runs at 1.66GHz, with 1MB of L2 cache and a TDP rating of 13W.[29]The single-core Atom D410 runs at 1.66GHz, with 512KB of L2 cache and a TDP rating of 10W.[30]
Tunnel Creek microprocessor[edit]
Tunnel Creek is an embedded Atom processor used in the Queens Bay platform with theTopcliffPCH.
Lincroft microprocessor[edit]
The Lincroft (Z6xx) with theWhitney PointPCH is included in theOak Trailtablet platform. Oak Trail is an Intel Atom platform based onMoorestown. Both platforms include a Lincroft microprocessor, but use two distinct input/output Platform Controller Hubs (I/O-PCH), codenamedLangwelland Whitney Point respectively. Oak Trail was presented on 11 April 2011 and was to be released in May 2011.[dated info][31]The Z670 processor, part of the Oak Trail platform, delivers improved video playback, faster Internet browsing and longer battery life, "without sacrificing performance" according to Intel. Oak Trail includes support for 1080p video decoding as well as HDMI. The platform also has improved power efficiency and allows applications to run on various operating systems, including Android, MeeGo and Windows.
Stellarton microprocessor[edit]
Stellarton is aTunnel CreekCPU with an Altera Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA).
Sodaville SoC[edit]
See also:Intel Consumer Electronics
Sodaville is a consumer electronics Atom SoC.
Groveland SoC[edit]
See also:Intel Consumer Electronics
Groveland is a consumer electronics Atom SoC.
Third generation cores[edit]
The 32nm shrink of Bonnell is called Saltwell.
Cedarview microprocessor[edit]
Intel released their third-generation Cedar Trail platform (consisting of a range of Cedarview processors[32]and the NM10 southbridge chip) based on 32nm process technology in the fourth quarter of 2011.[31]Intel stated that improvements in graphics capabilities, including support for 1080p video, additional display options including HDMI and DisplayPort, and enhancements in power consumption are to enable fanless designs with longer battery life.
The Cedar Trail platform includes two new CPUs, 32nm-based N2800 (1.86GHz) and N2600 (1.6GHz), which replace the previous generation Pineview N4xx and N5xx processors. The CPUs also feature an integrated GPU that supports DirectX 9.
In addition to the netbook platform, two new Cedarview CPUs for nettops, D2700 and D3200, were released on 25 September 2011.[33]
In early March 2012 the N2800-based Intel DN2800MT motherboard[34]started to become available. Due to the use of a netbook processor, this Mini-ITX motherboard can reach idle power consumption as low as 7.1W.[35]
Penwell SoC[edit]
Penwell is an Atom SoC that is part of theMedfieldMID/Smartphone platform.
Berryville SoC[edit]
See also:Intel Consumer Electronics
Berryville is a consumer electronics Atom SoC.
Cloverview SoC[edit]
Cloverview is an Atom SoC that is part of theClover Trailtablet platform.
Centerton SoC[edit]
In December 2012 Intel launched the 64-bit Centerton family of Atom CPUs, designed specifically for use in Bordenville platformservers.[36]Based on the 32nm Saltwell architecture, Centerton adds features previously unavailable in most Atom processors, such asIntel VTvirtualizationtechnology, and support forECC memory.[37]
Briarwood SoC[edit]
Briarwood is an Atom SoC that is designed for a server platform.
Roadmap[edit]
The main article for thiscategoryisIntel Tick-Tock.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvermont
Silvermont
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Predecessor | Bonnell Saltwell |
|---|---|
| Successor | Goldmont |
Silvermontis a new low powerSoCprocessormicroarchitecturefromIntel. Silvermont will form the basis for two consumer SoC families; Merrifield intended forsmartphonesand Bay Trail aimed attablets,hybrid devices,netbooks,nettops, andembedded/automotive systems. As well as Avoton SoCs for micro-servers and storage devices; and Rangeley SoCs targeting network and communication infrastructure.[1]
Silvermont was announced to themediaon May 6, 2013 at Intel's headquarters atSanta Clara,California.[2][3]Intel has repeatedly said the first Bay Trail devices will be available during the Holiday 2013 timeframe, while leaked slides show the most recent release window for Bay Trail-T as August 28-September 13, 2013.[4]Both Avoton and Rangeley were announced as being available in the second half of 2013. The first Merrifield devices are expected in 1H14.[5]
Contents
[hide]
1Design
2Technology
3List of Silvermont processors
3.1Desktop processors(Bay Trail-D)
3.2Server Processors(Avoton)
3.3Communications Processors(Rangeley)
3.4Embedded/automotive processors(Bay Trail-I)
3.5Mobile processors(Bay Trail-M)
3.6Tablet processors(Bay Trail-T)
3.7Smartphone processors(Merrifield)
4Roadmap
5See also
6References
Design[edit]
Silvermont will be the first Atom processor to feature anout-of-orderarchitecture.[6]
Technology[edit]
See also:Intel HD Graphics
A22nmmanufacturing process.
SOC (System on Chip) architecture
3Dtri-gate transistors.
Consumer chips up to quad-core, business-class chips up to 8 cores
Gen 7Intel HD GraphicswithDirectX 11,OpenGL 3.1, andOpenCL 1.1support.[7]OpenGL 4.0 is supported with 9.18.10.3071 WHQL drivers[8]and later drivers.
10Wthermal design power(TDP) desktop processors.
4.5 and 7.5W TDP mobile processors.
20W (TDP) Server and Communications processors
List of Silvermont processors[edit]
Desktop processors(Bay Trail-D)[edit]
List of upcoming desktop processors as follows:
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
GPUModel | TDP | CPU Turbo | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
Release Date |
Price (USD) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-core | Normal | Turbo | |||||||||
| Value | 4 (4) | Pentium | J2850 | Intel HD Graphics (4EU) |
10W/2.4GHz | N/A | 688MHz | 792MHz | 2MB | 3Q13 | OEM |
| Celeron | J1850 | 10W/2.0GHz | $82 | ||||||||
| 2 (2) | J1750 | 10W/2.4GHz | 750MHz | 1MB | OEM | ||||||
| 4 (4) | J1900[9] | 10W/2.0GHz | ? | ? | 2MB | OEM | |||||
Server Processors(Avoton)[edit]
List of upcoming server processors as follows:[10]
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
GPUModel | TDP | CPU Turbo | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
Release Date |
Price (USD) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-core | Normal | Turbo | |||||||||
| Server | 8 (8) | Atom | C2750 | N/A | 20W/2.4GHz | 2.6GHz | N/A | N/A | 4MB | 3Q13 | $171 |
| C2730 | 12W/1.7GHz | 2.0GHz | $150 | ||||||||
| 4 (4) | C2550 | 14W/2.4GHz | 2.6GHz | 2MB | OEM | ||||||
| C2530 | 9W/1.7GHz | 2.0GHz | |||||||||
| 2 (2) | C2350 | 6W/1.7GHz | 2.0GHz | 1MB | |||||||
Communications Processors(Rangeley)[edit]
List of upcoming communications processors as follows:[11]
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
GPUModel | TDP | CPU Turbo | GraphicsClock rate | Intel QuickAssist |
L3 Cache |
Release Date |
Price (USD) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-core | Normal | Turbo | ||||||||||
| Communications | 8 (8) | Atom | C2758 | N/A | 20W/2.4GHz | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | 4MB | 3Q13 | $171 |
| C2738 | 20W/2.4GHz | No | $171 | |||||||||
| C2718 | 18W/2.0GHz | Yes | $150 | |||||||||
| 4 (4) | C2558 | 15W/2.4GHz | Yes | 2MB | $86 | |||||||
| C2538 | 15W/2.4GHz | No | $86 | |||||||||
| C2518 | 15W/1.7GHz | Yes | $75 | |||||||||
| 2 (2) | C2358 | 7W/1.7GHz | 2.0GHz | Yes | 1MB | $49 | ||||||
| C2358 | 7W/1.7GHz | 2.0GHz | No | 1MB | $49 | |||||||
Embedded/automotive processors(Bay Trail-I)[edit]
List of embedded processors as follows:[12]
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
GPUModel | TDP | CPU Turbo | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
Release Date |
Price (USD) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-core | Normal | Turbo | |||||||||
| Embedded | 4 (4) | Atom | E3845 | Intel HD Graphics (4EU) |
10W/1.91GHz | N/A | 542MHz | 792MHz | 2MB | 4Q13 | $52 |
| 2 (2) | E3827 | 8W/1.75GHz | 1MB | $41 | |||||||
| E3826 | 7W/1.46GHz | 533MHz | 677MHz | $37 | |||||||
| E3825 | 6W/1.33GHz | N/A | $34 | ||||||||
| 1 (1) | E3815 | 5W/1.46GHz | 400MHz | 512KB | $31 | ||||||
Mobile processors(Bay Trail-M)[edit]
List of upcoming mobile processors as follows:
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
GPUModel | TDP | CPU Turbo | GraphicsClock rate | L3 Cache |
Release Date |
Price (USD) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-core | Normal | Turbo | |||||||||
| Value | 4 (4) | Pentium | N3510 | Intel HD Graphics (4EU) |
7.5W/2.0GHz | N/A | 750MHz | N/A | 2MB | 3Q13 | OEM |
| Celeron | N2920[13] | 7.5W/1.6GHz | ? | OEM | |||||||
| N2910 | 7.5W/1.6GHz | 756MHz | $132 | ||||||||
| 2 (2) | N2810 | 7.5W/2.0GHz | 1MB | OEM | |||||||
| N2805 | 4.5W/1.46GHz | 667MHz | |||||||||
Tablet processors(Bay Trail-T)[edit]
List of upcoming tablet and hybrid processors as follows:
| Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
GPUModel | SDP[14] | TDP | Max CPU Turbo |
GraphicsClock rate | L2 Cache |
Memory Standard |
Max Memory Bandwidth |
Max Memory Supported |
Max Display Resolution | Release Date |
Price (USD) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Turbo | |||||||||||||||
| Value | 4 (4) | Atom | Z3770 | Intel HD Graphics (4EU) | 2W/1.46GHz | ? | 2.39GHz | 311 MHz | 667 MHz | 2MB | LPDDR3 1067 Dual Channel | 17.1 GB/s | 4GB | 2560×1600 | September 11, 2013 | $37.00 |
| Z3770D | 2.2W/1.5GHz | 2.41GHz | 313 MHz | 688 MHz | DDR3L-RS 1333 Single Channel | 10.6 GB/s | 2GB | 1920×1280 | ||||||||
| Z3740 | 2W/1.33GHz | 1.86GHz | 311 MHz | 667 MHz | LPDDR3 1067 Dual Channel | 17.1 GB/s | 4GB | 2560×1600 | $32.00 | |||||||
| Z3740D | 2.2W/1.33GHz | 313 MHz | 688 MHz | DDR3L-RS 1333 Single Channel | 10.6 GB/s | 2 GB | 1920×1280 | |||||||||
| 2 (2) | Z3680 | ?/ 1.33GHz | 2.0GHz | 311 MHz | 667 MHz | 1MB | LPDDR3 1067 Single Channel | 8.5 GB/s | 1 GB | 1280×800 | ? | |||||
| Z3680D | ?/1.33GHz | 311 MHz | 688 MHz | DDR3L-RS 1333 Single Channel | 10.6 GB/s | 2 GB | 1920×1280 | |||||||||
Smartphone processors(Merrifield)[edit]
Roadmap[edit]
The main article for thiscategoryisIntel Tick-Tock.
Airmont is the14nmshrinkof Silvermont.[6]
總結(jié)
以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的Intel CPU Microarchitecture的全部內(nèi)容,希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。
- 上一篇: java es 数据批量导入_Elast
- 下一篇: Ubuntu搭建联盟链,实现节点之间数据