论文拒稿的评价可以有多狠?
文 | 自然卷@知乎
自古嚴師出高徒,“天將降大任于是人也,必先苦其心志,勞其筋骨……”。然而,這并不能作為審稿人走向“鍵盤俠”之路的理由!讓我們這些卑微投稿人心里真是好涼涼!?_??
大家來看看,這些毒舌傲嬌又搞笑可愛的人兒們,都是怎么花式拒絕我們的?!
(重點:審稿人說得都對,我們實則心存感激,一定認真改!)
難以招架的編輯評論
The results are as weak as wet noodles.(結論跟濕面條一樣軟弱無力)
The authors are amateur.(作者怕不是個兼職的)
It is a bit for me that authors have used Python statistical analysis instead of SPSS or Matlab as usual.Please,explain.(本文用了Python而不是像通常用SPSS和Matlab處理數據,為啥)
Did you have seizure while writing this sentence?Because I fell like I had one while reading it.(你寫文章的時候犯癲癇了嗎?反正我覺得我讀的時候犯了)
Why chase a gene in this ridiculous organism?(為什么在這種荒誕的生物里追求一個基因)
This paper introduce tools to answer questions which it dose not seem many people are interested in.(本文介紹了些解決問題的工具,然而人們并不感興趣)
The English language ranks this manuscript among the top 5 worst manuscripts I have ever reviewed.(這篇文章的英語水平可以排進我看過的最爛的前五)
I started reading this manuscript with much anticipation.But my enthusiasm was short lived.(我滿懷期待讀這篇文章,但熱情很短)
I have rarely a more blown-up and annoy paper in the last couple of years than this hot-air balloon manuscript.(我過去幾年都沒讀過這篇像屁一樣煩人的文章)
Figure3.This figure is silly.(這圖好蠢吶)
This paper makes no contribution.(這文章有錘子貢獻)
But now, there are over 1000 articles on this topic. But this author have not read a single.(這個方向至少有一千篇文章,作者沒讀過一篇)
Reject-More holes than my grandads' string vest.(拒了,漏洞比我爺爺的背心上的網眼還多)
The biggest problem with manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.(這篇稿子審得我都想自掛東南枝了)
This paper is desperate. Please reject it complete and then block The author's email ID so they can't use The online system future.(文章太差了,麻煩封掉作者的賬號以免他以后再投稿)
The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.(手稿和數據顯示讓我整個人都不好了,不得不提前下班,開始懷疑人生)
The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student.(就算回到本科時期,我也會拒掉這種文章)
It's hard for me to understand why it takes 5 authors to perform and describe one simple experiment.(我很難理解為啥需要5個作者來闡述這么簡單的一個問題)
This was a possible candidate for me the 'worst use of statistics to substantiate and falsehood' award.(這篇文章可以競選一下瞎雞兒統計學得出錯誤結論獎)
If I had known this would be sucj an easy one to review(reject!), I would have done it earlier instead of waiting for my dog to have a baby.(拒了,早曉得審稿如此簡單,我就該早做了而不是等我狗生完)
萬能回復模板
后臺回復關鍵詞【入群】
加入賣萌屋NLP/IR/Rec與求職討論群
后臺回復關鍵詞【頂會】
獲取ACL、CIKM等各大頂會論文集!
總結
以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的论文拒稿的评价可以有多狠?的全部內容,希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。
- 上一篇: 无内鬼,来点ICML/ACL审稿人笑话
- 下一篇: AI从业几年还不具备提出新模型的技术能力